Melton had 7 sacks in 2011 and 6 in 2012 but people think he is the greatest DT to ever play the position.
his is all he could do while Peppers was next to him getting al the double teams.
0 sacks in 2013, I know he tore his ACL but a guy that should have had atleast a few before he got hurt
http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/12695/henry-melton
Melton had 7 sacks in 2011 and 6 in 2012 but people think he is the greatest DT to ever play the position.
his is all he could do while Peppers was next to him getting al the double teams.
0 sacks in 2013, I know he tore his ACL but a guy that should have had atleast a few before he got hurt
http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/12695/henry-melton
That's what got us in this mess.look at the deal that the Saints gave the Bills Safety......you can do a big time deal and make the year one number look tiny.
how can we, we only have 7 million in cap space. melton will take a chunk of that. Also what other players are out there thats going to help this team. All the great players have been taken.
I'm fine with Melton at a discount and cap friendly but no way should we pay him more than Minny or Seattle offered him. shouldnt pay Hatcher money
right but people want to pay Melton big money coming off a ACL tear. I would rather take a chance on Easley in the 2nd than Melton.
That acl has to be a concern.
Hatch is a safer bet
At the same price though
Danny screwed things up with that contract.
pay no more than 5 yr 25 mil.
Honestly someone with NFL rewind needs to just watch those 3 games last year and report back with how he did
You're worried about Melton coming off of a torn ACL, but you would rather take a chance on Dominique Easley, who has torn an ACL in each knee, including last year?
And bank on him just falling into our laps too.
You're worried about Melton coming off of a torn ACL, but you would rather take a chance on Dominique Easley, who has torn an ACL in each knee, including last year?
10 teams would pay more than that. It'll most likely be more than Hatcher"s deal because he's younger.
Remember, other teams have tons of cap space and are required to use it with the new rules.[/quote
1. The 1st year cap hit on Carr's 50M contract was 3.2M. They Cowboys could sign 2 free agents to 50M contracts and not use all of the 7M.
2. The Cowboys could free up a total of 23.5M in cap space if they wanted to do it. It only takes 1 day to restructure other contracts.
but that would be stupid. this team isnt close to a superbowl so why do any of that? Why loe more cap pace from next year by doing the restructures. I'm fine just building through the draft and have max cap space next year for thoe great free agents to be next offseason,1. The 1st year cap hit on Carr's 50M contract was 3.2M. They Cowboys could sign 2 free agents to 50M contracts and not use all of the 7M.
2. The Cowboys could free up a total of 23.5M in cap space if they wanted to do it. It only takes 1 day to restructure other contracts.
right but people want to pay Melton big money coming off a ACL tear. I would rather take a chance on Easley in the 2nd than Melton.
under
but that would be stupid. this team isnt close to a superbowl so why do any of that? Why loe more cap pace from next year by doing the restructures. I'm fine just building through the draft and have max cap space next year for thoe great free agents to be next offseason,