The problem in this thread, is the people I am arguing with consistently say things that are complete and utter bull****
The30YardSlant;4480003 said:
For the sake of argument I won't remind you that he should have been detained immediately following the situation and wasnt...oops.
He was handcuffed, he was put in the back of a police car, and he was taken to the police station, where he was stuck in an interrogation room and questioned for hours.
So you appear right off the bat as someone that doesn’t know what the hell he is talking about. Does that stop you from participating? It didn’t the others I corrected over and over and over and over. Strike 1
Based on the known evidence, we know three things:
1: Trayvon was doing nothing illegal prior to the confrontation and nothing suspicious prior to Zimmerman's unjustified interest in his presence.
Zimmerman’s testimony is known evidence, and he says Martin was doing suspicious things. Strike 2
2: Zimmerman got out of his car and approached someone who knew neither who he was or that he was carrying.
No known evidence shows Zimmerman approached Martin. We think that Martin began the confrontation by asking Zimmerman a question because of what the girlfriend says. Strike 3
3: Had Zimmer done even one thing differently prior to the confrontation Trayvon wouldnt have died that night.
That isn’t known evidence. You are just being ridiculous now.
Unless you can show that Zimmerman's actions did not in any way lead to Trayvon's death then there is nothing for us to admit.
You can admit the multiple mistakes you made in this one post, but I won’t hold my breath