Neighborhood watch captain kills black teen - doesn't get arrested

[CowboyMcCoy]

you guys are making **** up. the police refer to what they have as testimony.

Because police are experts in the language of the law. :laugh2:

BTW, we're not laughing with you....

 

[Eric_Boyer]

Interesting that you post a link that you believes proves one point and in doing show disprove another that you yourself made. :laugh2:

you are delusional. if you had anything, you would of posted it.

 

[Romo_To_Dez]

That's the key here.

If he's innocent, try the guy.

Plenty exists as it stands to arrest him. There wouldn't be many, if any at all, attorneys, judges or non-Floridian police who'd disagree with me.

I agree I have yet to see any good reasons of why Zimmerman is not arrested. Even with a witness claiming to see Trayvon on top of him, then that witness should speak for ZImmerman's side in Court.


Nothing can justify not having an arrest. If the SPD did their job 100% right others would not have to be brought in for an investigation of their own even with the public outcry.


If there is a tape of Zimmerman being interrgated then it should eventually be released like other tapes are.


It has been admitted that Zimmerman was allowed to go home with the clothes he killed Trayvon in. Where he could wash away or get rid of any evidence that the SPD was too lazy or didn't care enough to collect because they wanted to believe Zimmerman.


Not acceptable any family who loses a loved one even in claims of Self Defense should have the cooperation of the Police department to collect all of the evidence and Police statements as they can.


No excuse for the SPD not doing a proper investigation. It's not common just to let a person go home in their clothes after they killed someone and the SPD allowed this to happen.


By the way I find if funny that ZImmerman at first claimed that he got jumped from behind as he was going to his truck, Now he says that Trayvon hit him in the face and he fell backwards? Changing the story?

 

[trickblue]

It's ridiculous. These people are arguing against an ARREST. Not a conviction, but an ARREST.

I disagree... they are protesting for a conviction... He's already been tried and convicted in the media...

If GZ gets arrested and acquitted, you'll see twice as big a melee'...

 

[Eric_Boyer]

Because police are experts in the language of the law. :laugh2:

BTW, we're not laughing with you....

laugh all you want. I have pointed out so many things you were ignorant of, it isn't even funny.

and you aren't even correct this time. Zimmerman had to sign a sworn oath that what he told the police was correct. that is testimony.

 

[TheCount]

you guys are making **** up. the police refer to what they have as testimony.

The police can refer to it as whatever they want to. Police collect statements, no one is sworn under oath when they speak to the police. Even during an interrogation.

 

[iceberg]

i do have 1 question -

if you kill someone in self defense, are you arrested and put to trial by default? has EVERYONE who's ever been through such a tragedy had to go through being arrested and put on trial?

 

[The30YardSlant]

you guys are making **** up. the police refer to what they have as testimony.

The same police that can't get their stories straight about where this "testimony" was given? Or whether or not he was detained? :laugh2:

I did make one mistake however, apparently his statement wasnt sworn as it was never given in the form of a signed document and a sworn statement can he held against you. Verbal accounts cannot.

 

[Eric_Boyer]

I disagree... they are protesting for a conviction... He's already been tried and convicted in the media...

If GZ gets arrested and acquitted, you'll see twice as big a melee'...

bingo.

first it was that he wasn't detained. when it is shown he was,

they want an arrest

and when they get that, they want a conviction.

 

[CowboyMcCoy]

http://www.cfnews13.com/content/new...s/articles/cfn/2012/3/22/trayvon_martin_faq_f
Why was George Zimmerman not arrested the night of the shooting?

When the Sanford Police Department arrived at the scene of the incident, Mr. Zimmerman provided a statement claiming he acted in self defense which at the time was supported by physical evidence and testimony. By Florida Statute, law enforcement was PROHIBITED from making an arrest based on the facts and circumstances they had at the time. Additionally, when any police officer makes an arrest for any reason, the officer MUST swear and affirm that he/she
is making the arrest in good faith and with probable cause. If the arrest is done maliciously and in bad faith, the officer and the City may be held liable.

All you did is post some article, (1) written by someone who doesn't know what they're talking about. Or (2) taken from the police's statements.

Either way, the article isn't a legal document. And it doesn't make you right.

On the other hand, you're helping me make my probable cause case (which doesn't need my input to do so).

I have to run, but I'll check in later to see if you've come around to reality and stopped trying to bring us into this fantasy land of yours.

 

[iceberg]

I disagree... they are protesting for a conviction... He's already been tried and convicted in the media...

If GZ gets arrested and acquitted, you'll see twice as big a melee'...

that's what i hate. they're not calling for justice, they're calling for blood, justice be damned.

 

[Eric_Boyer]

The police can refer to it as whatever they want to. Police collect statements, no one is sworn under oath when they speak to the police. Even during an interrogation.

you sign a statement that what you said is true. this is testimony. Zimmerman did that.

 

[The30YardSlant]

you are delusional. if you had anything, you would of posted it.

I was hoping you werent that dense...

When the Sanford Police Department arrived at the scene of the incident, Mr. Zimmerman provided a statement claiming he acted in self defense which at the time was supported by physical evidence and testimony.

Just as EVERY WITNESS claimed, what you posted claims his statement was given at the scene and not the police station. Those same witnesses said Zimmerman drove his OWN CAR away from the scene prior to the police leaving.

 

[CowboyMcCoy]

laugh all you want. I have pointed out so many things you were ignorant of, it isn't even funny.

and you aren't even correct this time. Zimmerman had to sign a sworn oath that what he told the police was correct. that is testimony.

testimony n. oral evidence given under oath by a witness in answer to questions posed by attorneys at trial or at a deposition (questioning under oath outside of court). (See: testify, trial, deposition, evidence, witness)



http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/testimony

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/deposition
:bang2:

 

[Romo_To_Dez]

Zimmerman now says that Trayvon went for his gun.

Also, whoever said earlier that Trayvon was suspended for "10 days for assaulting a bus driver", he was actually suspended 5 days for being found with an empty bag of weed.

So it looks like the evil media is spinning both ways.

The Media only supports ZImmerman's side, that's why they are interviewing people who defend Zimmerman.

 

[Eric_Boyer]

I was hoping you werent that dense...



Just as EVERY WITNESS claimed, what you posted claims his statement was given at the scene and not the police station. Those same witnesses said Zimmerman drove his OWN CAR away from the scene prior to the police leaving.

he spent hours at the police station. he signed a sworn statement before he left.

you didn't even know he was detained, don't pretend you know anything else about the detention. you look like an idiot the more you lie.

 

[vta]

All you did is post some article,

Who at this point hasn't? All anyone has to use for their view are reports from our great media. Either it's a useful source of information or it's all worthless ****.

 

[The30YardSlant]

laugh all you want. I have pointed out so many things you were ignorant of, it isn't even funny.

and you aren't even correct this time. Zimmerman had to sign a sworn oath that what he told the police was correct. that is testimony.

First of all, you're still wrong and don't known what testimony is. Second, Zimmerman never signed anything. The police have never said he dd, the police report never said he did, and every witness says he gave a verbal statement and drove away.

The police are covering their ***** here, and even THEY can't lie to the extent that you ae giving them the opportunity to.

 

[Eric_Boyer]

Who at this point hasn't? All anyone has to use for their view are reports from our great media. Either it's a useful source of information or it's all worthless ****.

thank you sir!

 

[Eric_Boyer]

First of all, you're still wrong and don't known what testimony is. Second, Zimmerman never signed anything. The police have never said he dd, the police report never said he did, and every witness says he gave a verbal statement and drove away.

The police are covering their ***** here, and even THEY can't lie to the extent that you ae giving them the opportunity to.

so you are arguing the moon landing is fake.

fine. nothing anybody is going to say can convince you. the police are lying is your argument, which means ever piece of evidence they show is a lie, so long as it hurts your cause.

why would anybody waste their time on you knowing this?