Rackat;3055656 said:
She is not "in black face". Black face was an intentional overcharacterization of African Americans during the early part of the 20th century. What this young lady did, was use makeup to change the tone of her skin to better match the rapper she was trying to portray in her costume.
Black Face was done with malice and intent to demean.
Wearing a halloween costume imitating a rapper is not even an issue. If it is, then you need to examine why it is an issue for you.
Exactly. She dressed up as Lil Wayne. She's likely a fan of his music, though that is nothing more than an assumption on my part. Black face was done with the intent to be jerks toward black people, this was not.
peplaw06;3055661 said:
The guy behind her in the pic has white makeup on to look more pale... I'm assuming vampire or something.
That's offensive too.
Clearly that dude from that awful Twilight movie should be in an uproar over this.
rocyaice;3055693 said:
Her intentions weren't malicious I don't think but it doesn't matter. She went out of her way to make herself black. That's where the controversy is at. You just can't do that. Even in 2009. Its not about imitating to be a rapper. If it was Eminem she was portraying there would be no problem.
Let me tell you what people see when they look at her. They see every single black stereotype there is. From the diamond teeth, to the wife beater to the hat, to the tattoo's? Its just tasteless. And then to paint yourself black? That's where the controversy is. I'm not sayiing we should be in a uproar about it but I am a bit shocked by the nonchalant attitude people are giving this. But I can't say that i'm shocked. Some don't know the history.
So basically, by what you said here, it's because she's white and decided to do a black person for her costume? If she'd decided to do a white rapper that would have been totally cool. So it's nothing more than the fact that she is white and dressed up as a black person as her costume. The stereo type junk is nothing more than smoke and mirrors in this case. You're offended that a white person dressed up as a black person.
WoodysGirl;3055703 said:
True and some people should evolve past the history and look at today's relevance of an act.
Exactly. It would be a totally different thing if she was doing it as a way to piss on the entire black community or to mock them. That is obviously not the case here.
aikemirv;3055712 said:
She is not in makeup to be a black person. She is in makeup to be a specific person.
I think there is a big difference!
Huge difference. She's not dressed up to be a stereotype to an entire group of people. She dressed up to be a specific person. There shouldn't even be a hint of issue with this but, as I suspected when it came up, the issue is simply that it's a white person who did it.
Reverse the roles and have one of those black chicks make themselves look like Eminem and this doesn't even get posted.
rocyaice;3055747 said:
Its not just about the fact she painted herself black. If you look at the picture she's enforcing every single stereotype that black people every day try their hardest to break.
Ummm...no. Absolutely wrong on so many levels.
#1: She's dressed up exactly like Lil Wayne is famous for dressing up. We all know now that he's going to jail he's changing his image as much as he can, and good for him if that makes him happy, but this has nothing to do with enforcing some stereotype on black people. If that were the case then you should be pissing and moaning about how Lil Wayne was doing that.
#2: They're trying hard every day to break them? All of them are? Really? I guess that's why ever black rapper whose into gangster rap and junk continues to dress just like that, call eachother the N word, and basically makes money off of every possible stereotype out there. I guess they're trying super hard to get away from it as well.
Cajuncowboy;3055749 said:
I wonder if he'd have a problem with a black person dressing up as a famous white person and putting on white make up?
Or maybe this..
Clearly Paris Hilton should have sued. Or at least started an angry blog about this travesty.
zrinkill;3055914 said:
Nope ..... some people can recognize what real racism is and what is not.
And some people look for anything that they can call racism to glorify themselves.
Exactly. Some people just have to play the racism card as often as possible. It's a by product of certain people and groups turning anything, and everything, they possibly can into an issue of race. Mainly cause, you know, they want to rid the world of racism...just so long as they don't get rid of it totally to where it takes away their ability to make money and cause issues over racism.
rocyaice;3055944 said:
How can you make new history when old history keeps rearing its ugly head? You have to know the history to move on to new history. If not, history will repeat itself.
One way is for people to stop trying to turn everything into an issue of racism, especially in cases like this when there is none to be found, just so they can bring up how people were treated 50 or 100 years ago.
FloridaRob;3056005 said:
I guess I should be preparing for a lawsuit. My grandkids dressed up as Gene Simmons and a movie star. What's the difference?
http://img.***BLOCKED***/albums/v349/FloridaRob/100_9001.jpg
Pretty simple. They're white and they're portraying white people. That's perfectly fine on Halloween. Now had he dressed up as Jimmy Hendrix then there would be some serious issues man. Clearly then you're kid would be showing how racist he is and how much he wants to enforce racial stereotypes.