GhostOfPelluer
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,389
- Reaction score
- 5,309
Agreed. Had that thought myselfGoodell's only out here is to vacate the suspension, fire Lisa Friel, and claim he is shocked by her actions.
Agreed. Had that thought myselfGoodell's only out here is to vacate the suspension, fire Lisa Friel, and claim he is shocked by her actions.
I hope she apologizes profusely because she was wrong as heck and loud about it. Its one thing to be wrong but to get on the moral high horse and be wrong like it appears she is whats wrong with too many people trying to be on the "right" side of things facts be darnedIt's on baby, I can't wait to see Molly Qerim throw a fit over this
Agreed.What I really don't understand is the NFL were the ones who kept this in the light. It was a very minor headline that was barely even talked about other than when news leaked out about THEIR investigation. They backed themselves into this corner. Of all the cases to pull this stunt on, this is the one the NFL decided to fall on the sword for? It absolutely screams something foul is afoot. There's really no other explanation that is plausible.
Hey I'm all for boobs. But that was a bad look for the league and worthy of 1 game suspension imo under the personal conduct policy. If the NFL had any sense they would realize they're fighting a losing battle.The nfl already said he wasn't getting punished for St Pattys. If they did they would open up another can of worms. Gronk is on tape for motorboating a chick. And I'm sure plenty of other players have done the same. Zeke's girlfriend told them she was fine with it and it was at a Marti Gras type event.
No, the NFL said that wasn't what they were suspending him for. They did refer to that event. But the suspension was for the alleged violence.Hey I'm all for boobs. But that was a bad look for the league and worthy of 1 game suspension imo under the personal conduct policy. Which is what he was technically suspended for correct? Not domestic violence?
Not at all! The NFL straight up said this was about the DV claims and in no way related to anything else. Can't go back and change it now.Hey I'm all for boobs. But that was a bad look for the league and worthy of 1 game suspension imo under the personal conduct policy. Which is what he was technically suspended for correct? Not domestic violence?
There was a time I thought the conspiracy angle was far-fetched. Now it seems the most plausible explanation
She's gonna be the patsy, Goodell will claim plausible deniability since he did not read Roberts conclusion in the report or hear them in the meeting. He will feign shock at Friel's actions and promise to investigate, since that worked so well in the first case.Goodell's only out here is to vacate the suspension, fire Lisa Friel, and claim he is shocked by her actions.
Right but he was suspended 6 games for violating the personal conduct policyNot at all! The NFL straight up said this was about the DV claims and in no way related to anything else. Can't go back and change it now.
Mike Florio drops a gem here:
...and not a peep about Joe Nixon. SMHWhat I really don't understand is the NFL were the ones who kept this in the light. It was a very minor headline that was barely even talked about other than when news leaked out about THEIR investigation. They backed themselves into this corner. Of all the cases to pull this stunt on, this is the one the NFL decided to fall on the sword for? It absolutely screams something foul is afoot. There's really no other explanation that is plausible.
Zeke's alleged violence occurred after he was drafted. So he was an NFL employee. Mixon and his abuse occurred before he was drafted....and not a peep about Joe Nixon. SMH
No, they claimed the DV occurred based on Thompson's word & photos.Hey I'm all for boobs. But that was a bad look for the league and worthy of 1 game suspension imo under the personal conduct policy. Which is what he was technically suspended for correct? Not domestic violence?