On thefan, Romo praticed as holder for folk

Rampage;3132044 said:
starting qbs don't hold for fgs and xps. this is why I can't help but laugh out of anger at the morons in charge of this team. i'm so pissed after reading that.

you were pissed and angry way before this decision was made...

Rampage;3132081 said:
what a ****ing joke. the guy has enough on his plate and now he's gotta hold cause our overrated punter can't even do that. all he can do is kick it far he can't even pin the other team inside the ten. morons everywhere when it comes to this team. smh


over rated...really ?...children say the darndess things

Rampage;3132228 said:
if he drops another hold he's done. his confidence will be broken and not fixable. I can't believe this is even a situation. this team is so stupid they can't find anybody to hold for fgs except their 70 million dollar franchise qb.
:lmao: :lmao2:
 
chuffly;3132356 said:
It's not a worthless stat if you think it's a dangerous job. As a matter of fact, it's a very, very relevant one to the discussion at hand.

You seem to care a lot more than me. Go fetch the stat!

Romo at holder is a dumb move. It will work fine until something happens. Since no one here can guarantee nothing will happen I classify it as idiocy.
 
Bleu Star;3132369 said:
You seem to care a lot more than me. Go fetch the stat!

Romo at holder is a dumb move. It will work fine until something happens. Since no one here can guarantee nothing will happen I classify it as idiocy.

and since you can't guarantee that something will

idiocracy

my man, casting doubt is the weakest argument known to man, well, slightly above nanna-nanna-boo-boo
 
I can just see some cheap shot ST player going after Romo.

Heck I can see some cheap shot coach telling his player to take a shot at Romo.
 
Bob Sacamano;3132373 said:
and since you can't guarantee that something will

idiocracy

Wow! We both have opinions! & they're different! Yippee. Welcome to a message board. ;)
 
Bleu Star;3132369 said:
You seem to care a lot more than me. Go fetch the stat!

Romo at holder is a dumb move. It will work fine until something happens. Since no one here can guarantee nothing will happen I classify it as idiocy.

Well if we are playing by that logic, I'll classify it as genius since you can't guarantee something will happen.
 
Bleu Star;3132378 said:
Wow! We both have opinions! & they're different! Yippee. Welcome to a message board. ;)

you look like the slimmer, male version of Ms. Cleo :D
 
Zman5;3132375 said:
I can just see some cheap shot ST player going after Romo.

Heck I can see some cheap shot coach telling his player to take a shot at Romo.

Nah man. According to the shills that will never happen. Not possible. Please get a grip.
 
This thread is officially bookmarked. I sincerely hope I don't have to return to it and bump it only to have it locked by a mod in record time. Good luck Tony. Godspeed.
 
Seriously, though, Romo could get hurt doing a lot of things. He could get hurt walking down the stairs. He could hurt his hand drawing up secret plays with Witten. He could get some vicious VD chasing tail at the nearest club. Do we keep him from doing all of those things just because he could get hurt?

If you have some evidence of a number of people getting hurt holding the football, then that changes things entirely. Until then, I don't see the point in handling him with kid gloves just because we are paranoid over what could happen.
 
Well that's no fun, he left right as I was typing my response...
 
chuffly;3132394 said:
Seriously, though, Romo could get hurt doing a lot of things. He could get hurt walking down the stairs. He could hurt his hand drawing up secret plays with Witten. He could get some vicious VD chasing tail at the nearest club. Do we keep him from doing all of those things just because he could get hurt?

If you have some evidence of a number of people getting hurt holding the football, then that changes things entirely. Until then, I don't see the point in handling him with kid gloves just because we are paranoid over what could happen.

:bow:if it could potentially improve the ball-club...

and we have evidence that it could, Romo is a pretty good holder, then you take the chance

and Rampage, worrying about Romo's mental state because of holding, and what may happen if he gets a slick-ball again, which will never happen again, is a bunch of psycho-babble
 
Huh? I'm right here slick.. But wasting time responding to some posts is not a favorite thing of mine to do. It's bookmarked. I'm content.
 
Bleu Star;3132405 said:
Huh? I'm right here slick.. But wasting time responding to some posts is not a favorite thing of mine to do. It's bookmarked. I'm content.

I love you
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,054
Messages
13,786,162
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top