Optimistic about O Line

Wasn't someone claiming here earlier that being sent to the pro bowl means nothing?
 
summerisfunner said:
only a few people are saying our line is top 10, 2 at most, you're going to have to change the criteria of who would be right or wrong, such as the line will be better than last year's group

Will our OL be better? Hell, a blocking dummy at LT, RT, and C would have made it better.

Doesn't mean I would rely on them.

Either way, we are going to find out what kind of OL we have week 1.
 
burmafrd said:
I am not worried about blizes- Bledsoe is pretty good at them. What hurt us last year is that most of the sacks came with just the 4 down linemen.

If by "pretty good" you mean curling up in the fetal position and getting smacked by two, sometimes three linemen, then yes, I agree
 
oh get off of it. Bledsoe burned a lot of teams that tried to blitz.
 
HeavyHitta31 said:
Somehow, I dont think having TO will stop Greg Williams from blitzing us into submission.

he stopped blitzing in that MNF game, and TO and the 2-TE offense makes us much more dangerous than that
 
summerisfunner said:
it hasn't been proven in Dallas, but there must be a reason Dallas is doing it, in hopes that it will, so yes, something that is on level with what a coaching staff feels will help is a goodarse point

In "HOPES" that it will.

Thank you.


That is all.
 
wileedog said:
Williams stopped blitzing us early in the 1st half of the 1st Washington game because we were burning them on it.

And that was without TO.

Williams didnt blitz hardly at all that game, he didnt just suddenly stop because we were burning them
 
Vintage said:
Will our OL be better? Hell, a blocking dummy at LT, RT, and C would have made it better.

Doesn't mean I would rely on them.

our coaching staff is however, and they feel that it could be better, so excuse me if I rely on them and not you
 
summerisfunner said:
he stopped blitzing in that MNF game, and TO and the 2-TE offense makes us much more dangerous than that

Again, he never started, so how could he stop?
 
HeavyHitta31 said:
Williams didnt blitz hardly at all that game, he didnt just suddenly stop because we were burning them

He blitzed several times early in the game that led to a couple of nice JJ runs. He stopped after that.

Its a blitzing defense, why would he choose not to blitz for a whole game for no reason?
 
burmafrd said:
Wasn't someone claiming here earlier that being sent to the pro bowl means nothing?

Yep. I did.

Then I decided to use your (or whoever it was) logic.... Rivera was once a Pro Bowler; so he is healthy, and thus, a Pro Bowler.

Fine, Allen was a pro bowler LAST YEAR. He is healthy, so then, he is a Pro Bowler.

We replaced him with a non Pro Bowl OG.

Therefore, we are worse at that spot.

-------------------------------------
 
Vintage said:
In "HOPES" that it will.

Thank you.


That is all.

if there's hope, there's always something to give it, it's not like Dallas is just throwing something together in hopes that it works, no, they've done their research, so they must see something to give them that hope
 
summerisfunner said:
and now you bring a link from ESPN of all people, that's even funnier!

What does that link being from ESPN have anything to do with its material? I can get a link with the same info from NFL.com if you'd like :rolleyes:
 
summerisfunner said:
he did, it's amazing how you're always wrong, you definitely have a gift

He didnt, and considering you are adamently defending what was the worst O-Line in football, you might want to bite your tongue on dishing out the "you are wrong" banter.
 
HeavyHitta31 said:
Williams didnt blitz hardly at all that game, he didnt just suddenly stop because we were burning them

so it's gone from he didn't blitz, to hardly?

:laugh1:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,094
Messages
13,788,553
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top