So there is no misunderstanding what I'm saying, I will preface what I am about to say with thefollowing:
1. Pac Man appears to be a thug with bad character;
2. He has exhibited poor judgment repeatedly;
3. He should be suspended;
4. The league needs to make an example out of him;
5. The odds are he is way more culpable than even the current facts show.
6. NFL players should be good role models.
I agree that him going to a strip club after everything that has happened is lunacy. I also understand that once a person has run it in the ditch like Pac Man has that certain restrictions on his conduct are reasonable.
Here is my concern. The NFL isn't in the business of building churches, ministers, or saints. Pac Man engaged in a legal activity and did not apparantly violate any state, federal, or local law in doing so. If the commisioner suspends him additional games for a lawful activity, at some point it may come under court scutiny. If the NFL were to lose that legal battle it would probably curtail the commisioner's powers and limit his effectiveness to mete out future punishment.
Keep in mind the more punishment that a person has imposed upon him by the NFL, the greater the chance that it will be tested in court. Further the more unreasonable the punishment the greater the chance it will be overturned. If he suspends Pac Man for one or two games in 2008 I doubt it will be an issue that he would bother taking to court. If he gets suspended for all of 2008, that would make two full years suspension, making it an almost certainty that he will seek redress from the courts.