Pay Prescott!

Aviano90 said:
OK, if i have to give you an example. Do you think Pappydog cares if Dak makes $660K, $30 million or $40 million? He's going to hate Dak regardless. Can you not see the difference between yourself and Pappy?
Click to expand...

I would say that this is a question that you should ask Pappy. I'm not going to judge him, as to why he feels as he does. That's just flat out wrong. Conversely, I've been accused of many, many egregious things, simply because I believe in being fiscally responsible. I don't like that feeling and I don't like the practice.

The question here is not if there is a difference between that poster and I, or if I can see it. The question is, who, why and for what reason do you make these claims?
 
ABQCOWBOY said:
I would say that this is a question that you should ask Pappy. I'm not going to judge him, as to why he feels as he does. That's just flat out wrong. Conversely, I've been accused of many, many egregious things, simply because I believe in being fiscally responsible. I don't like that feeling and I don't like the practice.

The question here is not if there is a difference between that poster and I, or if I can see it. The question is, who, why and for what reason do you make these claims?
Click to expand...
ABQ, the difference between you and Pappy is that you give actual reasons for your opinions, and recognize them as opinions. That seems to be something Pappy doesn't do, from what I've seen. He spouts his opinion, usually in venomous fashion.
 
ABQCOWBOY said:
I would say that this is a question that you should ask Pappy. I'm not going to judge him, as to why he feels as he does. That's just flat out wrong. Conversely, I've been accused of many, many egregious things, simply because I believe in being fiscally responsible. I don't like that feeling and I don't like practice.

The question here is not if I there is a difference between that poster and I, or if I can see it. The question is, who, why and for what reason do you make these claims?
Click to expand...
This is way deeper than I wanted to go by posting a brinks truck photo joke. If you're offended, I apologize. It wasn't directed at you, you just happened to ask a question in response to my photo.

I made the "claim" because it is true and I stand by it. It doesn't matter how much Dak gets paid, he's still going to be a hated player by a good portion of the fan base just like he is already. If that statement bothers you, then you're just going to have to deal with it. He's got haters as does a good number of other players on the team, too.
 
Aviano90 said:
OK, if i have to give you an example. Do you think Pappydog cares if Dak makes $660K, $30 million or $40 million? He's going to hate Dak regardless. Can you not see the difference between yourself and Pappy?
Click to expand...

Pappy cares as Pappy wants another Superbowl Title in Big D.
Paying Dak all those millions will cost us team-wise as we will lose talented players such as Byron and Quinn etc.
Dak Prescott cannot carry the team with his arm and needs millions of Cap $ around him.
As far as your hate comments that's your world bud and GL with it.
 
Last edited:
Dak and Garrett are tied together. If you extend one, you have to extend the other.
Dak is Garrett's guy. He might not be a real head coach's idea of what is needed.
He's pretty good in the Cowboys current system. Not elite, but good enough to beat the "also rans" in the league.
He isn't worth keeping Garrett. But I doubt Garrett will be fired until someone else owns the Cowboys.
Better get used to "Wait till next year!"
 
ActualCowboysFan said:
You made the claim. All of this dissembling is nothing but a poor attempt to hide the fact that you're making stuff up because as always you can't buy a clue. You're a sad person. C'mon coward. Back it up
Click to expand...

OK, no problem.

Here is an article discussing it. Dak is 10-14 against winning teams.

https://www.thebiglead.com/posts/da...nning-teams-is-cause-for-concern-01dpk8xfkex5

Now, it's your turn. Show me the QB who got a record deal with a losing record against winning teams, one sad person to another.
 
ABQCOWBOY said:
OK, no problem.

Here is an article discussing it. Dak is 10-14 against winning teams.

https://www.thebiglead.com/posts/da...nning-teams-is-cause-for-concern-01dpk8xfkex5

Now, it's your turn. Show me the QB who got a record deal with a losing record against winning teams, one sad person to another.
Click to expand...
I believe Aaron Rodgers fits that bill, although this stat goes back only 7 years, but he got a record deal in that time frame...

https://championinsiders.com/nfl/aaron-rodgers-record-against-winning-teams/
 
Runwildboys said:
ABQ, the difference between you and Pappy is that you give actual reasons for your opinions, and recognize them as opinions. That seems to be something Pappy doesn't do, from what I've seen. He spouts his opinion, usually in venomous fashion.
Click to expand...

Trust me, I understand. And obviously, you've never talked to me after a Cowboy Loss.

:laugh:

Trust me, my Wife will be going straight to heaven for putting up with me.
 
ABQCOWBOY said:
OK, he had at least one other pass that was behind the receiver as well. Another crossing route I believe.
Click to expand...

Dak couldn't hit the water from the boat.
Every pass is rarely on TARGET and the phrase we keep reading here is as follows....."It was a catchable pass"....this will go down as Daks legacy before he is shipped to the bench....
 
Aviano90 said:
This is way deeper than I wanted to go by posting a brinks truck photo joke. If you're offended, I apologize. It wasn't directed at you, you just happened to ask a question in response to my photo.

I made the "claim" because it is true and I stand by it. It doesn't matter how much Dak gets paid, he's still going to be a hated player by a good portion of the fan base just like he is already. If that statement bothers you, then you're just going to have to deal with it. He's got haters as does a good number of other players on the team, too.
Click to expand...

I'm not offended by that. I'm just trying to make that very point. This does tend to go way deeper and my experience in these matters, which is significant, tends to follow a very familiar path. Suffice to say that no good comes of it. I don't have a problem with anybody having an opinion. I don't have a problem with anybody expressing one, right or wrong. I just hate to see threads or posters go down a road that I know leads to trouble. That's really all I'm trying to say here. My message to you is, don't let this become more then opinion. Don't let innuendo start writing checks your backside has to cash because it never ends well. Take that for what you wish. End of day, you are going to do whatever you decide to do and the results will take their course.
 
ActualCowboysFan said:
There are three active QBs with winning records against winning teams. Seems like you had quite the problem producing your no context stat.
Click to expand...

I had no problem at all, took me like two minutes, an there are other articles that report the same thing. Now, if you have an issue with that article, then prove it wrong. That's on you, not me. I've posted a source for what you asked for. The problem here is you, it's not the info.
 
PAPPYDOG said:
Dak couldn't hit the water from the boat.
Every pass is rarely on TARGET and the phrase we keep reading here is as follows....."It was a catchable pass"....this will go down as Daks legacy before he is shipped to the bench....
Click to expand...

I don't share this opinion. I definitely think there are other QBs who are more accurate throwing certain routes but I would not say that he is rarely on target. I think he throws certain routes very well.

That's just my opinion.
 
ABQCOWBOY said:
I don't share this opinion. I definitely think there are other QBs who are more accurate throwing certain routes but I would not say that he is rarely on target. I think he throws certain routes very well.

That's just my opinion.
Click to expand...

Only when he has mucho time back there and only certain passes as his range of throws is limited due to his numerous flaws.

P.S. Don't let these Dak bullies sway you from what your commen sense is telling you. Dak will never be a top 10 QB just a glorified Bus Driver and that is best case scenario.....
 
Dak Prescott has now started every game for three full seasons and the first seven games of the current season.

At this exact same point in his career, Tony Romo had just completed his first start.

I'm not bagging on Romo, I just wanted to point out that Romo obviously improved enough to go from a guy that was inactive his first season to a Pro Bowler after his first season as a starter. He then improved from that point to get even better.

Why do some of us think that Dak has reached his cielng? I can assure you he has not. Dak will get even better.
 
Corso said:
I believe Aaron Rodgers fits that bill, although this stat goes back only 7 years, but he got a record deal in that time frame...

https://championinsiders.com/nfl/aaron-rodgers-record-against-winning-teams/
Click to expand...

Hey Corso, how you doing? Thanks for answering this. I think it's interesting that Rodgers doesn't have a winning record and he's actually a really good example, IMO. If I'm not mistaken, Rodgers got the new contract in 2013? He then got another in 2018? It would be interesting to look at what his record was prior to and compare it to what he has done since. He's actually a perfect example of why I think you shouldn't make Dak the highest paid QB in the NFL. As talented as Rodgers is, and he is about as talented as they come, he can't win without a team around him and his contract is the driver in why Green Bay has not won since 2010 and actually significantly declined in the last few years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 42 more.
Total: 26,621 (members: 142, guests: 26,479)
Robots: 705

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,065
Messages
14,509,919
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top