Now I know that you don't know what you're talkin' about, either... but in your case, I'm willing to chalk it up to your amusing deification of Delmas...
Yes sir, this thread has been quite instructive, it's let me know that some of you whose opinion I once respected are pretty much clueless...
I offer up quotes from NFL Draft Scout that say he's pretty good in coverage, and y'all ignore it... so now I'll offer some up from NFL Draft Countdown:
Yeah, that REALLY sounds like Roy (especially the parts in bold fonts)... so now we have two of the more respected draft sites out there, talking about how Moore is good in coverage, yet you self-proclaimed experts want to tell us that he's just another Roy...
Excuse me if I take their opinion over a bunch of know-nothing message board "experts"... you guys have clearly not done your homework... you see 6-0, 220, and you think 6-0, 230, and you equate that player to Roy...
As if all 6-0, 230 pound players are going to have the exact same skillset... that's the thought processes of a fool... as is the belief that anybody with that size is automatically going to be a liability in coverage...
Moore might or might not make it in the NFL, like any prospect coming into the league, but he ain't no Roy Williams, period...