Peyton takes 4 million pay cut. Romo should do same.

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
Nobody, IMO, should expect Romo to take a pay cut. It was the organizations decision to pay Romo what we are paying him and that is his money. Now, I was not in favor of paying him that amount but it's done and gone. Now we have to live with those decisions. If he elects to take a pay cut, that's his choice but nobody should expect him or demand he does. That's not how it works.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,949
Reaction score
23,097
A restructure would kill this team. Do you not understand a restructure. Pushes salary to a bonus and make it impossible to ever cut him or for him to retire

The restructure will not kill the team. The franchise qb retiring is what will kill the team.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
A restructure would kill this team. Do you not understand a restructure. Pushes salary to a bonus and make it impossible to ever cut him or for him to retire

That is just plain wrong. It has no impact on when to cut someone. Every salary dollar has to be accounted for, now or later.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
So what? The cap goes up every year. It is an interest free loan or 0% financing. The money has to be accounted for now or later. It is smarter to do it later when the cap is larger and the impact is smaller percentage wise.

So do salaries.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
The restructure will not kill the team. The franchise qb retiring is what will kill the team.

If they restructure Romo they will add only 2.6m to the cap for the next 4 years, but they will gain 13m in cap space
If they spend half this year and roll over half they are still ahead 3.9m next year
It is better to get the space now when they can use it. After next year they can't create as much space because his base salary is only 8.5m and he would only have 3 years left to pro-rate
It is simply math and nothing to be afraid of
 

supercowboy8

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,110
Reaction score
485
I bet if you agree to take a pay cut, Tony might join you :omg:

8th highest paid QB and Wilson doesn't have his deal yet.
Just had arguably the most efficient season of any Cowboy QB in history
Led the NFL in QB rating BOTH the regular season and playoffs

But hey, if he'll take a pay cut after giving back, lung, neck, ribs ...I'm all for it!

If I was making 17 million and I could wi a superbowl by taking a 3 to 4 million pay cut then yes I would
 

locked&loaded

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,609
Reaction score
960
i'm about to take back my 12 year old comment.

you're not there yet. with that, you're either trolling or just something i can't say. either way, my apathy has consumed the rest of my desire to read more of your posts.

I am embarrassed for you. smh

some people are so clueless they shouldnt be allowed to procreate.

Guess you have to just blame the parents.
 

supercowboy8

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,110
Reaction score
485
That is just plain wrong. It has no impact on when to cut someone. Every salary dollar has to be accounted for, now or later.

No salary doesnt. Bonus and guaranteed money is the only thing that has to be acountted for. Why do think it's possible to release a player to create cap space.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,949
Reaction score
23,097
If I was making 17 million and I could wi a superbowl by taking a 3 to 4 million pay cut then yes I would

Adding 4 million back to the cap would not guarantee a super bowl. Probability wise it probably doesn't change the odds.
 

supercowboy8

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,110
Reaction score
485
If they restructure Romo they will add only 2.6m to the cap for the next 4 years, but they will gain 13m in cap space
If they spend half this year and roll over half they are still ahead 3.9m next year
It is better to get the space now when they can use it. After next year they can't create as much space because his base salary is only 8.5m and he would only have 3 years left to pro-rate
It is simply math and nothing to be afraid of

Right adding more money to later contracts making it when he retires he will be a bigger cap hit. Restructure will be the wrong move.
 

supercowboy8

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,110
Reaction score
485
Adding 4 million back to the cap would not guarantee a super bowl. Probability wise it probably doesn't change the odds.

Nothing guarantee it but will help sign another player to help you. Dallas only has 5 million of cap space.
 

skinsscalper

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
5,693
Thick skulls leave no room for brains.

If I got paid 20 million a year at my job, was worth 50 million and knew that taking a 20% pay could would catapult my company to new heights; yeah, Id take the cut.

Sure you would. I mean because it means more to you to make a bunch of millionaires even bigger millionaires simply for the sake of it. To hell with your own finances, huh? You're either terminally stupid or full of ****.
 

supercowboy8

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,110
Reaction score
485
You weren't wrong

A pay cut is completely different from a restructure

The pay cut would save the full amount against the cap with no future implications

Right which is what Romo should do. We shouldn't restructure Any more.
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
Besides, I'd rather have this guy.


B_Ru9uYVAAASork.jpg:large

That's muffed up!! Lmao
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
Right adding more money to later contracts making it when he retires he will be a bigger cap hit. Restructure will be the wrong move.

Not if he plays for a couple more seasons. It will almost all be gone. Do you plan on cutting Romo next year??
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,949
Reaction score
23,097
Nothing guarantee it but will help sign another player to help you. Dallas only has 5 million of cap space.

They haven't restructured yet and they plan on signing Dez which will get his hit lowered from the tag.
 
Top