Stick to fried okra.
As I got to the end of the thread I kept saying to myself, "how come no one is bringing up the tired argument about Michael Irvin?" Well, I wasn't disappointed. I had to stifle a yawn as usual.
I like that Matt Jones has owned up to his mistakes in this article. I agree with some of the feelings that he is a better option than some of our young guys. I still don't want him.
What message does it send to the team to get rid of a Terrell Owens, only to bring in a Matt Jones? I think a very bad one. Let's look at the balance sheet.
How many times has Owens been arrested?
Tell me about Owens reputation as a lazy player?
Which WR had more production and value to his team?
I would take Owens over Matt Jones any day of the week and twice as much on game days. So why isn't Owens here? Because the team chose to send a message to the players that divisions and character issues are not going to be tolerated.
Sign Matt Jones, what message does it send Hurd, Austin, and Stanback? We really don't have faith in you like we said we did, and we're going to bring in a lesser guy than the one we got rid of.
I can't do that to this team.
Jerry Jones has already stated we have no interest in Matt Jones. I hope he sticks to his guns on that.