5Stars
Here comes the Sun...
- Messages
- 37,846
- Reaction score
- 16,869
Gangsta Spanksta;1829487 said:Looks like he was a Fool for walking in the wrong neighborhood. Where are his chians?
Vick stole them! It's his civil right to do so, damnit!
Gangsta Spanksta;1829487 said:Looks like he was a Fool for walking in the wrong neighborhood. Where are his chians?
Doomsday101;1829485 said:His civil liberties are being violated because we have state and fed law that punish people who commit animal cruelty? How are his rights being violated? You don't think what he did was wrong vast majority do and thus laws were created.
FuzzyLumpkins;1829488 said:i welcome you to go and read the CBA and read what it considers a player. once you are placed on an NFL roster and as long as you are at least seeking a contract you are a part of the NFL.
Bryant is still subject to all the rules and regulations of the NFL.
Youre still wrong so deal with it.
FuzzyLumpkins;1829495 said:dogs are property. you own dogs and as such they are youre property. now think about it a bit more. im sure im going to get some dog lover spouting about his dogs are 'family' but when it comes down to it dogs are property.
and again i dont think dog fighting should be illegal. i dont like it nor do i condone it but i am a big fan of government not being in my or anyone elses house telling me what i can or cannot do with my possessions.
5Stars;1829496 said:Oh....NOW he's "PART" of the NFL?
What happened to "he is in the NFL"?
Fuzzy, honestly, you need to apply to "Dancing With The Stars"! You are a sure winner there...
FuzzyLumpkins;1829495 said:dogs are property. you own dogs and as such they are youre property. now think about it a bit more. im sure im going to get some dog lover spouting about his dogs are 'family' but when it comes down to it dogs are property.
and again i dont think dog fighting should be illegal. i dont like it nor do i condone it but i am a big fan of government not being in my or anyone elses house telling me what i can or cannot do with my possessions.
FuzzyLumpkins;1829508 said:This Agreement, which is the product of bona fide, arm’s length collective bargaining, is made and entered
into as of the 8th day of March, 2006, in accordance with the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act, as
amended, by and between the National Football League Management Council (“Management Council” or
“NFLMC”), which is recognized as the sole and exclusive bargaining representative of present and future
employer member Clubs of the National Football League (“NFL” or “League”), and the National Football
League Players Association (“NFLPA”), which is recognized as the sole and exclusive bargaining
representative of present and future employee players in the NFL in a bargaining unit described as follows:
1. All professional football players employed by a member club of the National Football League;
2. All professional football players who have been previously employed by a member club of the
National Football League who are seeking employment with an NFL Club;
3. All rookie players once they are selected in the current year’s NFL College Draft; and
4. All undrafted rookie players once they commence negotiation with an NFL Club concerning
employment as a player.
YoMick;1829514 said:The eventual "loophole" has already been planted.... he bet on the dog fights and that is a no-no in the NFL.... should be banned and we should know that.... but we dont.
If there is a "decision" to be made.. then what is the deal? He bet, he is out. No decision to be made, right?
5Stars;1829503 said:Tough chit! Deal with it...or get out! Go somewhere where everything is "the way fuzzy wants it"...
Good luck with that!
5Stars;1829523 said:National Football League Management Council was not the initial arguement, fuzzy...
YOU said he was in the NFL, and he is not, at this time! Right?
FuzzyLumpkins;1829530 said:typical nonsense. if see something as wrong i speak out about it. if you dont like then deal with it.
quite frankly i think the erosion of civil liberties that weve been seeing over the last decade have been quite alarming.
FuzzyLumpkins;1829530 said:typical nonsense. if see something as wrong i speak out about it. if you dont like then deal with it.
quite frankly i think the erosion of civil liberties that weve been seeing over the last decade have been quite alarming.
Doomsday101;1829513 said:It is the aginst the law and no his civil liberties are not being violated. Just because you don't agree with a law does not make it a violation of a person’s civil liberties. Hell his own attorneys will not try to pull that argument because you are not going to win it.
FuzzyLumpkins;1829534 said:He is considered an NFL player by the CBA. You can argue the semantics of the word in all day long but quite frankly its boring.
5Stars;1829546 said:OK...
Hmmm, I wonder when our women are going to start wearing those scarfs over their mouths and heads and dresses all the way down to their feet!
Man, that's going to hurt, huh, fuzzy?
Also, I bet alot of gay folks and some black folks, womans rights, will disagree with you on that, along with many other issues that USED to be taboo...
"Dancing With The Stars"...get on it, fuzzy!
5Stars;1829551 said:Ahhh, the good old "semantics of the word" arguement...
Whose "semantics", fuzzy...yours or mine?
Muhast;1829547 said:Thought our days of arguing about criminals died in the 90's.
At least then we were arguing bout cowboys.
SMH