Entertainment? If you say so.Well...
You actually have people on this forum that can't separate entertainment and reality so when a guy like Skip Bayless says these things you have a group of people that actually buy into it.
I like Skip Bayless and enjoy watching all the debates on ESPN but my gosh it's just entertainment and a lot of the time it's not even close to the reality of the situation at all.
Dez is a cool dude and a great teammate as far as im concerned.
Did he have a good game against Cleveland? No
Was he being selfish, crying for the ball more, and campaigning for Tony Romo??? Absolutely NOT!
Entertainment? If you say so.
Bryant has bouts of selfishness. It's not an uncommon trait among professional athletes and especially wide receivers. He does sometimes cry for the ball. Some receivers have been doing that for nearly as long as there has been football. Now the campaigning for Romo is just baseless in my opinion. None of the aforementioned points equates him with Owens. Several levels of rationality separate Bryant from thatfoolperson.
You got me there. I don't have any proof to support my statement at this time.When?
You got me there. I don't have any proof to support my statement at this time.
Chicken a mammal?Dez Bryant is not Terrell Owens. Anyone stating both are the same type of individual are doing so from a wide ranging generalization--kinda like saying a chicken is just like a cow. What's the tie-in? They're both mammals. See? The same.
Well, I wasn't referring to any sideline crying--whether they were actual spats or not. I was talking more about what I thought I remember of him gesturing back at the quarterback after a particular pass wasn't thrown his way.I just don't see it.
The one time everyone thought he was exploding on the sideline because of not catching passes we later on in the week heard the actual content of what he was saying and it was nothing but him trying to motivate his teammates.
The perception of him is not the reality and any Cowboy fan that spends time on Cowboyszone like we do should know that.
If you only watch the games on Sundays and listen to what the guys at halftime try to sell then yeah I can understand but not someone on Cowboyszone that actually looks for extra information about the team.
Even if it is only half true that he missed upwards of 40 team meetings - as has been reported - that qualifies as character issues...at least to me. He's a vet who should be setting the tone for our rookies. Reading these reports of him being enabled by Jerry is quite disturbing to be honest.
Well, I wasn't referring to any sideline crying--whether they were actual spats or not. I was talking more about what I thought I remember of him gesturing back at the quarterback after a particular pass wasn't thrown his way.
I hate you.Chicken a mammal?
The point you made was excellent. I was just messin' with ya' cause I knew you could take it, and someone was going to call you out eventually.I hate you.
I've never been a strong proponent of the whole laying eggs thing. My long-standing compromise is that birds are neither mammals or reptiles but I would still say chickens are mammals if you asked me to choose. You are right to question it though. Chickens are regarded more as non-mammals by the scientific world.
That's a whole lot of popcorn. Extra butter? Salt?
Lol yes I'll take both please. Thank you sir!That's a whole lot of popcorn. Extra butter? Salt?