FloridaRob;3806050 said:
so if Rodgers brings the Packers back and puts them ahead or has them in a position to win the game but Mason Crosy hits the goal post, or the special teams gives up a huge return for a field goal at the end, or the defense forgets to cover anyone after they have the lead, then that is Rodgers fault. I can think of five games off the top of my head in the past three years that has happened.
Repeat, he was 0-10 till past Eagles game decided by 4 pts or less. Lets say, for 6 games, it was not Rodgers fault. Thats about 60% of time, which I find it unbelievable, but lets give him that. But it still puts him at 4 losses for him at the very least.
On the other hand, Including playoffs, Romo is 6-8 I believe in games decided by 4 points or less. So lets see how you spin that as Rodgers being superior to Romo clearly??
And no, its not just about stats. Its what I observed from watching Rodgers when the team needs a TD drive at the end to win a game, on something or other happens to prevent it happen, and mostly it was Rodgers.
It might change in future, I don't know. Till then, he is not superior to Romo. Rodgers is very good, no doubt, but so is Romo. But listening to fans such as you, one would think, Rodgers already won SBs or something. Heck Rivers won mnore Playoff games than Rodgers and with inferior talent than Rodgers. But somehow Rodgers is now equal to Brady/Manning/Brees. Please...