Speculation: Trade in the works?

[BigDFan5]

Translation: I like this site better and don't think its stupid to be a supporting member here. I just got banned there, thus, I hate it, thus its stupid to want to post there/support the site.

What it boils down too? Personal Preference. You think this site is better. I prefer to be there. As long as both of us are happy...

Try not to translate languages you don't speak brother, I have talked down Ranch long before i was banned because it is what it is a troll board you can not get a good conversation over there.

It does boil down to preference yet I KNOW this site is better, unless its not football talk you are after

 

[Vintage]

how about trading Ellis for Reed? I'd do that, esp if we were able to get Lawson at 18.
I don't want anything to do with Lewis.
Roy is a great player but I think if we moved Davis to SS, he'd be a stud, not as good as Roy, but a stud. Maybe we trade Davis and a pick for Reed if they want a S?

Davis and a pick for Reed?

Are you kidding me?

 

[peplaw06]

What it boils down too? Personal Preference. You think this site is better. I prefer to be there. As long as both of us are happy...

Then why are you here??

 

[BigDFan5]

Then why are you here??

Cause he is looking for good football talk lol

 

[Rack]

Its more than that Rack, and you should know (weren't you a Insider at the Ranch once, before you got banned? Is this the same Rack that used to post there a couple of years ago?)

Its about getting the news AND supporting a site I like to visit. RR is not the only site I make donations to. There is a basketball message board that I also give money too, as part of me saying "thanks" for allowing me to post there.

It helps support the site, a site I enjoy. You do the same here apparently.

Should I call you foolish too, no?

I have never, and never will, give 100 bucks a year for free information.


If I ever do that, then yes, you could call me foolish.



RP's true colors are shining through now...

There are other Cowboys websites out there that pretend to have the traffic we do here at ********Report.com. They pretend to have the personalities that we have developed here over the course of the last five years.

They inflate their numbers, their moderators/admins read private messages sent between members, and they pretend to have a clue about what's going on with the Dallas Cowboys. And they even try to sit back and bash all of our information ... the same information they try to figure out on their own site.

Here's a newsflash if you haven't figured it out by now: they don't have a clue. Never have, never will. They just have a bunch of moderators who have nothing better to do than to read our stuff and to try to make sense of it all.

You good folks here at The Ranch keep in right here and you'll be just fine. Let all the other wanker sites fall by the wayside where they belong.

You've got to be f'in kidding me. Accusing the mods/admins here of reading others' PMs? I didn't even think RP could stoop that low.


RP is the cowboys fans' version of Art.

Here you get good conversation, there you get trolls and bufoons.

Hey now, don't go dissing the buffoons. The Buffoons are alright.

Philpott would definetely be sticking it to a lot of people in this thread talking down on him for no reason

For now reason? You f'in kidding me? Did you read the crap he posted about this place over there? Accusing mods of reading others' PMs, calling WG, etc...

RP is a punk. Plain and simple. Before today I knew he was ripping people off with that "exclusive" crap he charges for, but now I know he's a much worse human being then I thought.

No class.

 

[kTXe]

Can't we all just get along?

 

[Vintage]

Then why are you here??

I forgot I was a member here, and when this site was linked over at RR, I came over to post in this thread.

Its a Cowboys Message Board. I am a Cowboys fan. Its really that simple.

 

[Vintage]

Rack, yes or no, is this the same Rack from RR a couple of years ago?

And you missed the other half of my point...I also support the site bec. I am a member of it. I help support a basketball forum by being a paid member, yet I recieve NO INSIDE information. The only thing I get is the ability to have any avatar I want....that, and the feeling of doing something worthwhile, donating money to a site I've been a member of for years.

 

[peplaw06]

I forgot I was a member here, and when this site was linked over at RR, I came over to post in this thread.

Its a Cowboys Message Board. I am a Cowboys fan. Its really that simple.

Translation: I had to get my money's worth, so I post over there.

 

[Rack]

Translation: I like this site better and don't think its stupid to be a supporting member here. I just got banned there, thus, I hate it, thus its stupid to want to post there/support the site.

What it boils down too? Personal Preference. You think this site is better. I prefer to be there. As long as both of us are happy...

Yet here you are, at the zone.

Can't we all just get along?

:grouphug: :shake: :toast2:

 

[Vintage]

Translation: I had to get my money's worth, so I post over there.

Clever. Admittedly.

This is a Cowboys forum. I am a Cowboy fan.... Let's see....no real stretch there.

 

[CATCH17]

For now reason? You f'in kidding me? Did you read the crap he posted about this place over there? Accusing mods of reading others' PMs, calling WG, etc...

RP is a punk. Plain and simple. Before today I knew he was ripping people off with that "exclusive" crap he charges for, but now I know he's a much worse human being then I thought.

I dont really know whats going on between those 2 but obviously it set Roy off and Woodysgirl doesn't want to argue back about it so take it how you want.

But i've been critical of his pay articles in the past as well but he put up a link that was showing stuff that we would do way before it happened this offseason.

If this trade went through I dont think you could question his articles anymore and honestly dont think they really need to be questioned much more anyways.

 

[Rack]

Rack, yes or no, is this the same Rack from RR a couple of years ago?

And you missed the other half of my point...I also support the site bec. I am a member of it. I help support a basketball forum by being a paid member, yet I recieve NO INSIDE information. The only thing I get is the ability to have any avatar I want....that, and the feeling of doing something worthwhile, donating money to a site I've been a member of for years.

1. Yes, the one and only... Rack. What's that got to do with anything? If I were a different Rack, would it change anything?


2. I sure wish I had the money to go throwing around at all these sites. My offer is still on the table, I'll send you an email of crap for 50 bucks a year.

 

[neosapien23]

Ed Reed is great ballhawk safety. Keith Davis could be moved to SS and the Cowboys would be better off. However, I don't think these trade rumors have any validity to them and if they do Greg Ellis would have to be taken off the swap. Ray Lewis is old and injury prone, and he still wants to get paid. Ellis, on the other hand, is still capable of rushing the passer and has alot of value for the nickel defense.

 

[Vintage]

Yet here you are, at the zone.






:grouphug: :shake: :toast2:

I've been posting in this thread, for what? All of 10 minutes maybe? Maybe 15.

Please answer the above question I asked you.

 

[Clove]

And then, the Ravens laugh in our faces. Ellis, a 3rd, and a future 5th?



I wonder what Roy is going to demand next year. Is he worth being paid the highest amount for a safety in NFL History? Because that's where its likely going.

That's where I would start the bidding. Then I would give up a second, and a 4th and Ellis and Davis for Reed. I would not go beyond that.

And for your question about RW pay, apparently the Ravens think so.

Edit: A next years 4th

 

[BigDFan5]

I dont really know whats going on between those 2 but obviously it set Roy off and Woodysgirl doesn't want to argue back about it so take it how you want.

But i've been critical of his pay articles in the past as well but he put up a link that was showing stuff that we would do way before it happened this offseason.

If this trade went through I dont think you could question his articles anymore and honestly dont think they really need to be questioned much more anyways.

what was on the link enlighten us

 

[Vintage]

No rack, it doesn't change my opinion of you at all.

I was mostly a lurker back then.....still am for the most part over at RR. I may have 250 posts in the 2+ years I've been there.

I just remembered the name, remembered you were banned, and thought it was most likely the same person.

Under the FWIW category: I did like your posts back then.

 

[JonJon]

Why is everyone saying TRR cost $100? That is only if you subscribe for a full year. On their sign-up sheet, you have monthly options for $10, which is a lot less than $100 just to read the special stories.

Back on topic:

I would be willing to give up Ellis and our #2 (assuming we are going to use our #2 on a safety this year) to get Ed Reed and their #4. Even though he was injured last season, when it comes to free safeties, is just doesn't get much better than Ed Reed. Why gamble on a rookie when you can have the real thing? We would also regain our 4th back that we gave up to get Chris Canty last season.

 

[Rack]

I dont really know whats going on between those 2 but obviously it set Roy off and Woodysgirl doesn't want to argue back about it so take it how you want.

WG has too much class to argue back with that punk. Thankfully, I am void of class so I have no problem letting him know exactly what he is... a punk.


Not to mention the fact that WG made her first post about RP in an attempt to get people to stop bad mouthing that place. She was doing him a favor and he responds by calling her out. Real classy.

But i've been critical of his pay articles in the past as well but he put up a link that was showing stuff that we would do way before it happened this offseason.

Like what? Name one thing he's "Broken".

If this trade went through I dont think you could question his articles anymore and honestly dont think they really need to be questioned much more anyways.

"If"... that's a big "If". I have a better chance of winning a 50 million dollar lotto then for that trade to happen.