TheDude
McLovin
- Messages
- 12,175
- Reaction score
- 10,634
Backed by nothing? I am telling you, despite your ridiculous 2005 crap site reports, he slipped. Fact. He wasn't very good in his limited action his first year in the league, fact. Took him over 3 years to beat out an aging QB, fact.
So you had multiple team scouts, some with QB needs, saying this guy wasn't worth an early first round pick and you're coming at me with Kiper? Rodgers slipped for good reason, he wasn't a very impressive college QB, he needed time to develop in the NFL and completely changed up his mechanics.
Anything else?
I am telling you that NFL scouts and FOs that continually pick in the top 10-15 might be more crap which you assign a higher opinion to than "crap sites." Did you even watch the draft? the huge story was his fall.
You know who also slipped over 260 spots in 2003? Romo.
From the article
Thompson told MMQB:
"Three or four days before the [2005] draft we're doing our research, going down the board, and I'm looking, and I think, 'None of these teams are taking a quarterback.' I couldn't find one, after San Francisco. We hadn't really paid attention to Rodgers because we just figured he'd be gone. Plus, we didn't have that big a need there, obviously. So I just buried myself and went to look at all the Rodgers tape—from games, from the combine, from his pro day. After a couple of days I just felt he was too good to pass. So I said, "If he falls to us, we're taking him.'"
So what do you have exactly other than "Well teams missed, so he must have sucked"