TRADED Texans trade WR Brandin Cooks to Cowboys

Big_D

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,212
Reaction score
15,519
one of the best offseasons in a while for dallas its a bit shocking somebody is waking up is it will mcclay running the show
It’s the McCarthy addition. The roster is light years better than it was 4 years ago which tells you there’s a better plan in place that didn’t seem to exist in 2019 or previously beyond that.
 

Plankton

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,237
Reaction score
18,606
The Cowboys needed a receiver who could get separation and that could take the top off of a defense. Cooks provides both of those elements. It's hard to find fault with the trade for what they gave up. I wish that he were 4 inches taller and had a bigger catch radius, but my biggest concern is the concussion history. That being said, this was a good trade, and the Cowboys are definitely better this offseason than they were coming into free agency. I hope that they can actually take the defensive tackle position seriously and bring in some actual talent at that spot. So far, they have done a nice job in bringing in two very solid veterans for minimal prospect cost. Well done.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,720
Reaction score
50,188
He's one of the most consistent WRs for separation and getting 1,000 yard seasons. Was on pace last year but sat out 4 games wanting to be traded.

Suppose to be a great locker-room guy as well.
I get that, but Cooks is going to be 30 years old when the season starts, will have lots of wear and tear, will have cost 2 draft picks no matter how we slice it, and we will have to still take up 2/3rds of his salary. You call that a good deal? I believe Houston got the better end of the deal.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,050
Reaction score
27,133
That is totally wrong............Brandon Cooks has broken 1000 yds in 6 of the 9 seasons he has been in the NFL (6 of last 8 if exclude rookie yr).

2014 (rookie yr)...550
2015.................1138
2016..................1173
2017...................1082
2018...................1204
2019...................583
2020....................1150
2021....................1037
2022.....................699 (sat out 4 games wanting to be traded or else would have had another 1000 yd season)
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,050
Reaction score
27,133
I get that, but Cooks is going to be 30 years old when the season starts, will have lots of wear and tear, will have cost 2 draft picks no matter how we slice it, and we will have to still take up 2/3rds of his salary. You call that a good deal? I believe Houston got the better end of the deal.
Bro, its a 5 this year and a 6 next year...................you aint drafting a WR in the 5th or 6th round that is going to break 1000 yds almost every dam year.

We drafted Tolbert in the 3rd last year and the dude never even played.
 

Tim93gt

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,477
Reaction score
1,614
Good,proven, speed guy, which is what many wanted on this board. Great move.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,720
Reaction score
50,188
Bro, its a 5 this year and a 6 next year...................you aint drafting a WR in the 5th or 6th round that is going to break 1000 yds almost every dam year.

We drafted Tolbert in the 3rd last year and the dude never even played.
I still don't like it brother. Here is why...

Cooks is going to be 30 when the 2023 season starts. The Cowboys just took up his new 2 year contract extension he received last year with the Texans. Cowboys will pay Cooks $12.5 mil this season and owe him $16.5 mil for 2024. That's a lot for a 31 year old WR with a lot of wear-n-tear for 2024, which makes me believe Jerry and Stephen will once again extend the contract a few more years down the road to create cap space whether Brandin Cooks remains with the team after 2024 or not. It's the same old crap once again of not being able to draft good young receivers or build and have them execute well for cheap. Plus, Cooks is short (5'10"). At his age and with his wear and tear, I doubt he has that 4.33 speed anymore. How is that going to help this Offense or fare well for Dak?

I realize it's too late to complain. Cooks is here at the cost that he is whether anyone likes it or not, but I believe the Cowboys would be smart to address a fast WR in the draft, preferably someone like the fastest WR at this year's Combine (4.33 speed) in the 2nd or 3rd round like Trey Palmer (6'0", 192 lbs)...



A legit 4.33 speedster who is young, has quick acceleration, strong hands, goes up high for high balls, has good moves with the ball while in traffic and can make plays short, mid or deep. Plus, would be cheap for 4 years.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,911
Reaction score
23,051
I get that, but Cooks is going to be 30 years old when the season starts, will have lots of wear and tear, will have cost 2 draft picks no matter how we slice it, and we will have to still take up 2/3rds of his salary. You call that a good deal? I believe Houston got the better end of the deal.
Houston could have had a 3rd last year and screwed the pooch. It was basically a 5th round pick for Cooks and they paid the extra 2024 6th for Houston to absorb $6 million of his salary.
 

DCwarrior

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,493
Reaction score
1,601
Dude has been playing in QB purgatory for a couple years. Surely our QB is better than what Houston trotted out on the field. I like it, get us a good NT before draft and we might can cook with gas.
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
I get that, but Cooks is going to be 30 years old when the season starts, will have lots of wear and tear, will have cost 2 draft picks no matter how we slice it, and we will have to still take up 2/3rds of his salary. You call that a good deal? I believe Houston got the better end of the deal.


Man, I’m surprised you view it that way. Those two draft picks combined would only have the trade value of getting a little further up in the 5th round. Not to mention that when a pick is a year away, it is valued at about a round lower than it actually is, so this year that 2024 6th is only worth a 2023 7th. In the NFL, those picks hold very little value. If they held much value, you’d see teams trading back for more 5th and 6th round picks.

The hit rate for the 5th, 6th, 7th rounds is tiny. Those picks rarely hit like with Bland in the 5th. Teams just try to do it with numbers, which is why they always try for so many un-drafted free agents.

Anyway, You are actually the only place I’ve heard say that Houston got the better of this trade. Most are giving Dallas the edge by a wide margin.

Here, CBS gives Dallas an A grade and the Texans a D+, which is a pretty good representation of how the trade is viewed around the league.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft...iants-trade-down-in-post-free-agency-edition/

Here is what they say about it:
——————————-

Cowboys: A

This is the latest move in what has been a savvy offseason for Dallas. Cooks is a player that they've been eyeing dating back to the trade deadline this past season and now get him for a song. Not only do the Cowboys only give up a pair of Day 3 draft selections over the next two seasons, they also have the Texans paying $6 million of Cooks' contract for the 2023 season. Cooks is an ideal speed threat who will complement CeeDee Lamb and Michael Gallup in Dallas' offense. The 29-year-old receiver has been able to put up numbers over the course of his career even when he was given inconsistent play at the quarterback position, so pairing him in a Cowboys offense with Dak Prescott could bring with it a very high ceiling.

Texans: D+

It became pretty clear that Cooks no longer wanted to a part of the Texans organization, so it's admittedly difficult to try and maximize a return. While the Day 3 draft picks over the next few years are glorified lottery tickets, the more egregious aspect of this trade from Houston's perspective is the team paying over a quarter of his salary for next season. That's an unneeded expense for a rebuilding team that needs as much capital as it can get to surround whoever their rookie QB will be with talent. Speaking of that, the Texans are pretty thin at the position going forward as they roll out Robert Woods, Nico Collins and John Metchie III.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,531
Reaction score
76,368
I get that, but Cooks is going to be 30 years old when the season starts, will have lots of wear and tear, will have cost 2 draft picks no matter how we slice it, and we will have to still take up 2/3rds of his salary. You call that a good deal? I believe Houston got the better end of the deal.
You can’t be serious lol. This has to be a joke. Y’all didn’t care how old D Hop and ODB were but Cooks who is 29 and will turn 30 during the season is too old to be a number 3 receiver?
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,720
Reaction score
50,188
Man, I’m surprised you view it that way. Those two draft picks combined would only have the trade value of getting a little further up in the 5th round. Not to mention that when a pick is a year away, it is valued at about a round lower than it actually is, so this year that 2024 6th is only worth a 2023 7th. In the NFL, those picks hold very little value. If they held much value, you’d see teams trading back for more 5th and 6th round picks.

The hit rate for the 5th, 6th, 7th rounds is tiny. Those picks rarely hit like with Bland in the 5th. Teams just try to do it with numbers, which is why they always try for so many un-drafted free agents.

Anyway, You are actually the only place I’ve heard say that Houston got the better of this trade. Most are giving Dallas the edge by a wide margin.

Here, CBS gives Dallas an A grade and the Texans a D+, which is a pretty good representation of how the trade is viewed around the league.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft...iants-trade-down-in-post-free-agency-edition/

Here is what they say about it:
——————————-

Cowboys: A

This is the latest move in what has been a savvy offseason for Dallas. Cooks is a player that they've been eyeing dating back to the trade deadline this past season and now get him for a song. Not only do the Cowboys only give up a pair of Day 3 draft selections over the next two seasons, they also have the Texans paying $6 million of Cooks' contract for the 2023 season. Cooks is an ideal speed threat who will complement CeeDee Lamb and Michael Gallup in Dallas' offense. The 29-year-old receiver has been able to put up numbers over the course of his career even when he was given inconsistent play at the quarterback position, so pairing him in a Cowboys offense with Dak Prescott could bring with it a very high ceiling.

Texans: D+

It became pretty clear that Cooks no longer wanted to a part of the Texans organization, so it's admittedly difficult to try and maximize a return. While the Day 3 draft picks over the next few years are glorified lottery tickets, the more egregious aspect of this trade from Houston's perspective is the team paying over a quarter of his salary for next season. That's an unneeded expense for a rebuilding team that needs as much capital as it can get to surround whoever their rookie QB will be with talent. Speaking of that, the Texans are pretty thin at the position going forward as they roll out Robert Woods, Nico Collins and John Metchie III.
Texans got the better end of the deal ultimately by $2.3 million dollars...

https://overthecap.com/valuing-the-cowboys-and-texans-trade
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,720
Reaction score
50,188
You can’t be serious lol. This has to be a joke. Y’all didn’t care how old D Hop and ODB were but Cooks who is 29 and will turn 30 during the season is too old to be a number 3 receiver?
I never wanted DHop or OBJ for the very same reasons: old age, wear-n-tear and high salaries. Very simple. Don't group me in with the other guys bro.
 

rambo2

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,788
Reaction score
15,754
I get that, but Cooks is going to be 30 years old when the season starts, will have lots of wear and tear, will have cost 2 draft picks no matter how we slice it, and we will have to still take up 2/3rds of his salary. You call that a good deal? I believe Houston got the better end of the deal.
Lol You have got to be kidding.
 
Top