Risen Star;5079754 said:
There's very little chance that BPA leaves you with no players at the OL year after year. You're talking about 5 positions and having one player head and shoulders above any other on your board isn't that common.
What's true is the Cowboys don't value those positions. So when they're sitting there looking at a small group of players at the top of their board, they favor the irrelevant cornerback over the non sexy pick of a C or G.
They had to do something this year. Once they did, they completely ignored the OL the rest of the way and including UDFA.
But, we've drafted two OLs in the first in two of Garrett's three drafts, so it's not accurate to say 'no players.'
I'd also disagree that it's uncommon to have a player ranked head and shoulders above over players for a given pick. I'd say it probably happens as often as not.
The Cowboys are pretty much like other teams when it comes to valuing OL positions. They value OTs, and, under Callahan, the apparently place a lot of value on C. They don't value OGs as highly, because everybody knows OGs are more plentiful and maybe the easiest position on the OL to hide a marginal player. There are just too many options there with small school guys who can develop from mid round picks and college OTs who move inside at the next level. It's pretty much supply and demand.
Except around here, where it's taken as an article of blasphemy for some reason. Most likely because it's so unlikely the team is going to reach for an OG, so it gives people something to complain about for longer about how the more things change, the more they stay the same.