For some folks, I think, the grass is always greener. Boldin is a very good player, but he isn't Jerry Rice, he isn't Fitzgerald. Jones is a work in progress. We'll see. But trading away or releasing young talent is a quick ticket to oblivion. The argument can be made of any young player: What's he done? Oh, he's only had four games, he's only had one season... people will even say, he's only done it for a couple of years. By that reckoning, it would always make sense to trade youth for age. Age will have done more. Yet most of us know that isn't sensible. In fact, it's usually one of the surest signs of a disastrous franchise.
I'm not sure I buy the idea that a WR is, on the face, more valuable than a running back. Teams have won with great wide receivers... probably more often than they have won with great running backs. But so much has to do with the nature of the team and of the player. Emmitt Smith surely had no less value than Michael Irvin. Tony Dorsett was more valuable than Tony Hill. Duane Thomas was more important to the Cowboys, one shining season, than was any WR on the team. In fact, Dallas has never won a Super Bowl without a great running back -- excepting Thomas, who might have had more talent than any back not named Jim Brown, Dallas hasn't won a Super Bowl without a Hall of Fame running back.