I'm definitely not saying cut him and I'm all for giving him a second-round tender, but I think too many as making him out to be more than he is, a guy with talent who might not excel in any role other than the one he has.
There's a big difference in being a guy teams don't really prepare for and being one of the main threats that teams identify as such and put their top corners on. The bigger the role, the more film there is to study and the more time spent in film study by the opponent. Your every tendency is scrutinized and teams try to take away what you do best.
Austin has talent, but can he do the things needed to step up his game and move into a bigger role? I don't know, so I can't say.
It seems to me that many on this board think they do know, which is jumping the gun a bit IMO.