I always find it interesting how in these types of scenarios people point out other draft mistakes other teams have made and how we don’t want to emulate that
But if you point out the litany of mistakes teams have made recently signing mediocre young quarterbacks to big time deals, for example Jared Goff with the Rams or Carson Wentz with the Eagles, And people still act like signing Prescott to a “market value” contract is the only tenable option on the table and that anything else is just ridiculously stupid
I’m not saying you are saying that KSK but that is the mindset of an awful lot of people on this board and it just doesn’t make any sense to me. A lot of people act like signing Dak to a big-time contractors a sure thing. I mean we don’t even need to look to other teams quarterback situations. We can look at our own team in recent years of guys having a big season in a contract year and we pay them a huge deal and it almost never pans out. What in the world has convinced people that this is going to be the magic time when it actually works? LOL
all I ever ask is that posters who want to get rid of Dak propose a viable alternative.
“Burn it down” is not a realistic strategy
“Draft a Pat Mahomes” is not a realistic strategy
“Franchise Dak, draft a QB, and see what happens” is a realistic strategy
“Sign Dak to a long term deal” is a realistic strategy.
If someone wants to argue against Dak, at least give us some type of plan or strategy to replace him.
Even if it’s simply “let Dak walk and draft the best QB available at #17”, it would be better than the pie in the sky calls for the Cowboys to do a magic trick and miraculously have the next Aaron Rodgers show up at camp this summer