I don't know. It's hard for me to justify a six game suspension of a guy just because he was there, especially when eyewitnesses contradict the accuser completely. Unless the league has more stuff on Zeke than they indicated in their letter, I don't get it. Prosecuting people to make a point or substitute for past inaction is a slippery slope. Absent any evidence beyond the judgment of the commissioner and four "independent" observers based completely on their perception of circumstances, that's what it looks like to me. Just my two cents.
P. S. I thought the Brady thing was BS too.