It would have to be a Walker type trade because if Romo could stay healthy he would torch our defense next season unless we find a pass rush and we would have a tough time getting past the Commanders in 2017. Romo could put them over the top if he could stay on the field and they can keep their receiving corp together. The LAST thing Jerry wants to do is to trade Romo to a division rival and have it bite him in the ***. Trading Romo to Washington could end up being the worst move Jerry ever made if it led to us sitting home next season and Washington ending up in the SB. When you look at the possible ramifications of making a move like, it's going to take the farm for Jerry to pull the trigger on that trade.
I wouldn't be completely against it, if they were the only ones offering a 1st. It could be argued that it would almost a double win. If the Commanders traded for Romo, that means they likely don't have cousins. So instead of maybe a decade of Cousins, they have one or two years of Romo, and lost a 1st round pick.Not the farm, frankly if the Commanders were the only team offering a 1st for Romo then you make the move. I know no one wants to see Romo on the Commanders but if they're offering the most for a QB that maybe has 2 years left you take it. Even if he plays well its not like we see him dominant for 10 years. Is it possible the Commanders win the division with Romo? Sure, but if the move helps strengthen the Cowboys d for years to come I would make the move.
Romo ( 37 as of 17 opener)
2014: 3,709/34/9. Romo 2015: 884/5/7. Missed 28 of last 32 games. Injury risk: High
Cousins ( 29 as of 17 opener)
2015: 4,166/29/11. 16: 4,917/25/12.
Started last 32 games. Injury risk: Low.
On the surface looking purely at stats, Romo is an upgrade over Cousins. Unfortunately injuries & age can't be discounted.
I'll admit " Just as good" was a bit of a stretch statement.
Hey, remember when people said no one would have any interest in an old, broken down QB?
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Who ever said there would be no interest in Romo? I don't think I've ever read or heard anyone say that. The question, which still remains, is will someone actually trade for him.Hey, remember when people said no one would have any interest in an old, broken down QB?
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Clearly a leak of some sortYou got sources? Sounds like it.
It was repeated here non-stop.........teams would only be interested if he was waived........we would get a 5th rounder at bestWho ever said there would be no interest in Romo? I don't think I've ever read or heard anyone say that. The question, which still remains, is will someone actually trade for him.
The Commanders have shown the willingness to go after an aging QB when they gave up a 2nd round pick for McNabb in 2010. At that time Washington was desperate for a QB and Philly was willing to take the chance of making that trade within the division because of the compensation and McNabb's skills had declined. I just can't see a move like this happening, because Washington doesn't have a bad QB situation and Romo isn't a long-term answer. Cousins is a productive QB passing for almost 5000 yards in 2016 and is only a step or two away from being one of the better QBs in the league. He hasn't reached his ceiling yet.
That isn't teams not having interest, though. Wanting to sign him if he's cut is still having interest. As I mentioned, the question still remains if a team will actually trade for him.It was repeated here non-stop.........teams would only be interested if he was waived........we would get a 5th rounder at best
Not the farm, frankly if the Commanders were the only team offering a 1st for Romo then you make the move. I know no one wants to see Romo on the Commanders but if they're offering the most for a QB that maybe has 2 years left you take it. Even if he plays well its not like we see him dominant for 10 years. Is it possible the Commanders win the division with Romo? Sure, but if the move helps strengthen the Cowboys d for years to come I would make the move.
I wouldn't be completely against it, if they were the only ones offering a 1st. It could be argued that it would almost a double win. If the Commanders traded for Romo, that means they likely don't have cousins. So instead of maybe a decade of Cousins, they have one or two years of Romo, and lost a 1st round pick.
I doubt Tony goes there, though.
Would you rather play Romo (who would be in a new offense) for maybe 1-2 years and get a 1st round pick for him, or play Cousins, who is at least a good to very good QB, for maybe a decade? Personally, I would consider the former.They won't offer a #1 for Romo he's too old and carries too high of an injury risk. It's obvious they're not totally sold on Cousins and aren't ready to commit long-term. Romo at $14M next season would be a lot cheaper than Cousins at $24M on the franchise tag but Romo may only have a year or two left with the huge injury risk he carries. They lose him and their QB situation is as bad as ever. Every season is precious and even if Romo lasted only one year, if it's enough to put Washington past us and in the SB that would leave Jerry in a very embarrassing situation having to answer to it. If Romo were to outplay Dak in the head to head meetings, the Romo FANS in Dallas would be in an UPROAR and Jerry would be persecuted for making that trade.
There's a potential for disaster for both teams if they make that trade. Romo could end up on his back in a couple of games leaving the Commanders without a QB or he could stay healthy and lead the Commanders past us and onto the SB. Trading Romo to Washington GREATLY increases the odds that moving on from him ends up blowing up in our face, especially in Jerry's face. Washington is picking at #17, I don't believe that draft position is worth having to play against Romo twice a year for the next 2-3 years if he can stay healthy. It would have to involve multiple picks, including a #1 pick and I don't see Washington doing that.
Romo will cost a little more than half of what Cousins will make this year. He would also be cheaper next year.
Would you rather play Romo (who would be in a new offense) for maybe 1-2 years and get a 1st round pick for him, or play Cousins, who is at least a good to very good QB, for maybe a decade? Personally, I would consider the former.
and 36m next year...... Cousins has 0 reasons to sign with WAS.... they are over a barrelYeah, I just pointed out Romo would cost $14M compared to $24M for Cousins but the compensation would be costly for an aging, injury prone QB that may only play a few games for them.