Yup. Problem is, they are so bad at evaluating, especially DT's, that they have to get lucky to find even a decent one. They mostly just ignore what it takes to be a successful DT, which is quickness, lateral agility, and strength. W/ Quinn, we were always drafting those slim antelopes for DT, and they just got run over. Now, we're at least trying, but we are still ignoring the traits that make the topnotch DT's. Osa: Too light. Mazi: Too straightlinish.
Now, I cannot fault the drafting of Gallimore. I have no idea why he wasn't better, not sure anyone knows.
And there's one of the biggest problems when drafting DT's. It is harder than any other position to predict pro success. Jerry tends to look for a black and white answer, but there simply isn't one.
I also thought Gallimore would be much better. If he suddenly is in Miami….that’s gonna be tough to handle.
If you look at say, WR and CB, throw in edge rusher…..those players are much more marketable than the blue collar dudes that play DT, MLB and S. I’m not saying that’s how they operate fully, but I’m sure it’s a factor….if you’re not able to at least offset some of your salary with marketability, they will be hesitant to invent higher end resources.
That’s the gut of the defense, and how they’ve been burned several times before. Instead they seem to want to blame it on the ball not bouncing correctly.
Again though its not as if they haven’t tried at DT, they have simply failed. Games are won and lost in the front office as much as on the field.
My point overall is there is only one angle they haven’t tried at DT, which is spending for a proven one. Stevie’s little draft only system, while ideal in theory, hasn’t worked and probably won’t. You’d figure that would prompt the thought of some change, and maybe it has…..then they realize that no one in the world is smarter than them, and stick with it.
I want to be positive as opposed to complaining, but I have a tough time thinking they are ever going to get this right.