blueblood70
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 43,771
- Reaction score
- 29,452
Agreed but well they sort of did, the Other Tsmith 73This weird narrative that’s going around media and fans is the Cowboys should’ve addressed tackle before now. First off the narrative is a lie. They have addressed tackle in the middle of the draft. Now if the argument is they should’ve addressed it in the first round? The only time it made sense was Slater over Parsons and that would’ve set this team back years.
So when was this suppose to happen? When we drafted Lamb? Diggs? When?
they have addressed it in many drafts , just not with high draft picks and those picks could still do things, zoners calling them trash, some trolls said all of them together are worth sandwich,smh clueless fans , overactions are in full force..overdrive,
I remember when Big Nate newton was thought to be an overweight jag and many thought he wouldn't make the team..hmm steeles been better than advertised so has guy like Doug Free were uinderrated and hated here etic didn't Parnell get nice deal when he left that other Guard..
its possible wolezztco(sp?) or ball can develop. Fans dont want to hear it.. same fans think if you are all pro or PB your rookie year they want you gone LOL guys like BO and Wright many have said they hope they are cut ..BO already showing some improvement. fans are clueless.