Cowchips said:
I look at it this way. Drew is probably a top 10 QB with the potential to be top 1 or 2 if he has the right tools. Dallas is getting the benefit of having an elite qb for very short money. He needs protection, so spend the extra money they would be paying for a Manning or a Brady on protection and let's get this party started. .
I definitely think that Bledsoe is a top 10 QB in the league, probably top 7 or so but I couldn't honestly put him top 2 or even 3. The reason being is that there are a few QBs in the league that singlehandedly elevate their team and don't need all-star casts to have success. I think Brady, Womanning, and Carson Palmer are elite. I used to have Mcnubb in this class but I think he has fallen off quite a bit since he got fat and isn't much of a threat to run anymore. Then I think there are some QBs that have a decent cast of characters but they really lead the team and make it just a little better than it should be..Hasselback, Brees, Delhomme, Bledsoe, Mcnubb, Green, Roth and Brunell...I think in that order with Simms having the potential to break into that. I think Roth makes his team better but its only by not making mistakes rather than carving up the D. I think Plummer looks better than he is because of his team, same for Eli, Vick, and Daunte. I think the others I didn't name are such garbage they're not worth mentioning.
.[/QUOTE] When was Elway recognized as a great qb? After he took a huge paycut and the Bronco's used the money to shore up a pathetic o-line and get T. Davis. Bledsoe has done his part of this equation by taking 3rd string money, now it's time for Dallas to step up with one or two more elite o-line players. .[/QUOTE] How about the comeback over Cleveland in the playoffs? Probably about then Elway went from VERY good to great and it became a defining moment even though they didn't win the SB that year. Very much like Jordan hitting the jumper over Ehlo to win the series even though they got hammered in the next round. It was a defining moment where a player singlehandedly is recognized as being able to elevate his team.
.[/QUOTE] Why is P. Manning never successful in the playoffs? Because he has 1/2 the payroll of the Colts sitting in his checking account. .[/QUOTE]
Actually, he has a pretty good OL. I assure you our staff would probably trade ours for theirs straight up anyday. They also happened to have, or had, Edge, Harrison, Wayne, and Clark...not exactly garbage....I'm not sure how many more players Indy could've asked for. Maybe a few more players on defense, but I still think it comes down to the fact that Womanning is a choke artist and always has been and probably always will be. If he ever wins a ring it'll be a gift that someone gave them. They won't "beat" a good team in the clutch. 0-4, Manning's record against Spurrier's Gators in college. Immediately following, T Martin (the worst QB to ever win anything) takes UT to a championship, or should I say got out of the way enough to help UT to win one, with a lot of the same players Manning had. Fishy eh?
Its crazy too because low pressure games, Manning is the best in the biz. Flat out unstoppable.
.[/QUOTE] Why was T. Brady always successful? Because up until last year, he was one of the lowest paid qb's and they could afford the supporting cast. This year that will end. T. Brady won't get 15 touchdowns and the Pats won't do better than 8-8. Remember where you heard that first!! .[/QUOTE]
Supporting cast for TB?!? Where? They haven't had a secondary for years, they didn't have a running back until Dillon, and they've never had a WR that was anything more than decent. They're best WR wouldn't have even started for us last year. McGinnest, Harrison, and Bruschi have been they're only major defensive forces and the running game was only good the year they beat the iggles.