Rockport
AmberBeer
- Messages
- 43,112
- Reaction score
- 42,666
Well Dak’s inaccuracy is a weakness.Am I in the wrong thread? I thought this was about Aikman's opinion of Dak's accuracy?
Well Dak’s inaccuracy is a weakness.Am I in the wrong thread? I thought this was about Aikman's opinion of Dak's accuracy?
Yes.Are you referring to Aaron Rodgers, the guy who was getting so much attention in the draft because of how surprising it was that he hadn't been selected early in the first round?
No need to resort to name calling. The point can be made without it.Lol, youre a joke. You justcompared a qb from the 70s to a qb in 2018 like the rules havent changed
If you were old enough to see some of Bradshaw's games, he certainly wasn't accurate. It doesn't matter what era you play in. Go watch some old films and get educated.Lol, youre a joke. You justcompared a qb from the 70s to a qb in 2018 like the rules havent changed
Yes, it is.Well Dak’s inaccuracy is a weakness.
Aikman didn't always have the greatest line. And contrary to what many suggest, Aikman could run the ball. He made everyone on offense better, he demanded it.With a good O-line, I'd take Troy over just about anyone......With a bad O-line, I'd take Romo over Troy.
Uhh it does matter when db's were allowed to get away with much more at that time. Im gonna get you hooked on phonicsIf you were old enough to see some of Bradshaw's games, he certainly wasn't accurate. It doesn't matter what era you play in. Go watch some old films and get educated.
The logic some of y'all use is so laughable it isn't funny. I hope y'all keep this type of logic to online and don't say such offline. It's not worth noting that accurate qbs overthrow receivers all the time because nobody said they didn't smh. The thing is always the consistency of said missing of open receivers.
You're not an expert on accuracy but if you have tried any hobby you should know you can improve on something but there is a limit to it most times. If it wasn't everybody that did the same level of anything would be the same and we know that's not true. Dak just isn't accurate and it isn't much improvement coming. That's not just him but anybody after some time of development. You may improve a little but the big changes are very rare after a certain period of development.
Ironic that OP spent thousands of posts trolling for Jameis as the greatest QB in a generation.This board is simply toxic. What an awful place.
It absolutely can be taught, to suggest otherwise is silly.Golf swings and pitching are taught. If they were natural motions, there would be many more tiger woods' in the world. And far more 20 game winners in MLB. I remain convinced accuracy can be taught by perfecting techniques. You don't.
Dakuracy
Running is a natural motion but are you and I faster than Usian Bolt? It's a lot of things that's natural don't mean everybody is at the same level of doing it. You remain convinced accuracy can be improved because of ego not being realistic. Dak is set in his ways now. If he hasn't improved on that accuracy that he has been know was a problem before he set foot in the nfl don't get how y'all think he about to change it all of a sudden. Accuracy can be taught to a beginner but like most things after awhile your natural skills even with training help can get you but so far.Golf swings and pitching are taught. If they were natural motions, there would be many more tiger woods' in the world. And far more 20 game winners in MLB. I remain convinced accuracy can be taught by perfecting techniques. You don't.
I don't remember him being a particularly good runner, but I agree that he did make everyone around him better. He was the unquestioned leader of his team.Aikman didn't always have the greatest line. And contrary to what many suggest, Aikman could run the ball. He made everyone on offense better, he demanded it.
It wasn't often, but he ran a few well. I think the perception is that way because he didn't have to the vast majority of his career.I don't remember him being a particularly good runner, but I agree that he did make everyone around him better. He was the unquestioned leader of his team.
I have been asking the same thing here since 2006.Why are we so critical of one QB??
May I suggest something based on many years of being a CowboysZone member?These threads are ridiculous it needs to stop because it doesn't matter they do, you guys will hate on your QB
I'm tired of the third year excuse about Dak. He's been starting since game 1 with offseasons so that excuse don't hunt for me. He misses too many wide open easy plays and doesn't overall make enough to make up for it or else it would be less polarizing Dak talk.Maybe so, but Dak, imho, doesn't need a huge improvement in some areas for this team, with Zeke, a good defense and a good o-line, to be a SB contender. When people complain about Dak missing "wide open" receivers like Gallup, they fail to remember Gallup's a rookie, Cooper's only been here a handful of games, Hurns is new to the team this year, Swaim has now been out some games, the line is missing Frederick, T. Smith is not the T. Smith of old and don't forget the poor play calling. That's a lot for a third year quarterback to overcome.
Apparently (not saying you) think that ALL this team needs is a better quarterback and it's all going to come up roses. Well the Vikings thought ALL they needed was a stud running back, so they got Walker, and how many SBs did they win with him? ZERO. Eagles thought all they needed was a few "star" defensive players to win a SB, so the "dream team" was born. How many SBs did that team win? ZERO. Mike Ditka traded every draft pick he had for one Ricky Williams, and how many SBs did the Saints win with him? ZERO.
Problem is to get the "stud" quarterback (who could end up another Russell or Leaf), you have to either lose all but a couple of games and get the top 1-2 draft pick, or trade for a "stud" veteran quarterback (and get a Alex Smith or Cousins, who to this point haven't done a whole lot) and have to give up lots of high draft picks, and then you gotta pay him, so you're limited as to who you can pay as supporting cast). Either way it's a crap shoot as to what happens.
It's not up to us, it's up to Jerry. And I'm thinking he knows his time to get another ring is running short, so he doesn't want to start over with a rookie hot shot quarterback or hope the vet can stay healthy (see Alex Smith) for a few more years.
We can gripe about Dak all we want, but I seriously doubt he's going anywhere for at least 2-3 more years, at the least...
I don't get it how could one call himself a fan and be so critical of your quarterback even in winning situations?I have been asking the same thing here since 2006.
May I suggest something based on many years of being a CowboysZone member?
Do not hold your breath.
lolI have been asking the same thing here since 2006.
May I suggest something based on many years of being a CowboysZone member?
Do not hold your breath.
Simple.I don't get it how could one call himself a fan and be so critical of your quarterback even in winning situations?
The law of diminishing returns is an excuse?Excuses.