Vintage;1859945 said:
Dunno.
But it would
affect his playing performance.
I was with you on the Carpenter debates leading up to the draft.....and I still think Carpenter will develop into a good player for us. I think that starting him at OLB, moving him to ILB, back to OLB following Ellis' injury, back to ILB this season.....has slowed his development.
Man, I always get Effect and Affect mixed up.
Agreed with the last part. Maybe if they'd leave him at ONE position, he might be able to win a starting spot?
Funny Wade didn't mention that he moved Carp during training camp just like he (Carp) was moved around last year.
theogt;1860031 said:
Here's what he said word for word:
I think he expected Bobby to overtake Bradie going into this preseason like many of us did. But Bradie lost the weight and played extremely well -- the best football of his career. And Bobby just couldn't justify taking his spot, especially playing poorly as he did. But I think Bobby's going to make a real go at Ayodele's spot next season.
As for not working him in defensive packages, the additional packages we've added throughout the season have been more pass-oriented, removing linebackers from the field, not adding them. So there's really not been anything added where Bobby could have possibly contributed, even if he was playing lights out.
theogt;1860041 said:
I'm not convinced Burnett is sturdy enough to be an every down 3-4 ILB.
Agreed. I like the way KB plays too. He's our most athletic ILB, but he can't hold up as a fulltime starter.
FuzzyLumpkins;1860062 said:
Drew got hot in the middle of August and had an OPS around 1.000 for the remainder of the season leading into the playoffs.
Carp was hurt in that audition, he plays and works hard and played well for 4+ games last season including a playoff game.
Ive seen the guy play well as have others. I seriously doubt that he just lost that and the fact that he has worked his backside on ST instead of moping should tell a lot about his character.
I have never understood why people literally attempt to will him to fail.
On the freakin' money.
Hong2221;1860216 said:
I understand we drafted Carp in the 1st round, however, it doesn't mean he has to start within a year or two. On top of that, it should not mean he isn't a good football player.
We don't have to start him within a year or two because there are players right now that out performs him at this stage of his career. Lets look at the linebacker position. Bradie, Ware, Ellis, Burnett ... and the list goes on. We're stacked.
But do not doubt his playing ability, he is good. Look at him in the Seattle game, the dude was all over the field. So relax guys, we're winning football games, the change is not needed yet. - Hong
theogt;1860241 said:
Who in the next 10-15 picks would be starting had we picked them?
The only player I would have taken would have been Cromartie (hindsight is great). But Cromartie still wouldn't be starting for us. But it would be nice to have him out there instead of Reeves.
Beast_from_East;1860415 said:
He may have done everything right. He may work hard at practice, stay late watching film, study his playbook, ect...
I am not busting his balls here, I am just saying that if you are a first round pick and all you do is play special teams 2 yrs later, something is wrong.
Maybe the reason he cant get on the field is because the current starters are just simply better?
And? How does that mean Carp "Sucks"?
So I guess Barry Sanders "Sucked" at OSU, then after Thurman Thomas left to the NFL he (Sanders) magically became good?
It is possible for a backup to not be as good as the starters, yet still be good.
What a freakin' concept, huh?