jimmy had his fingerprints all over the defense. and does anyone doubt how quickly jimmy would have fixed the timekeeping, predictability and other issues that everyone pounds on the coaches?
since the offense is so predictable, moore is going to have to a massive amount of work to do to take out all the tendencies with formations, etc.
when garrett was first hired, much ado was made of his huge playbook and how it was this 'space age' advanced etc.
You will go to great lengths to ignore the fact that it’s not uncommon for head coaches to neither design offenses or defense or call plays for the sake of fabricating an argument against Garrett. There are very real arguments against Garrett, but this is not one of them.
I disagree completely about the task you are talking about with Moore. Predictability comes with running the same plays in the same situations, and simply not doing that would eliminate a lot of predictability. As for formations, I read awhile back that the Cowboys don’t use formations much different than the Rams, but the difference is the Rams disguise things much better with shifts and motion before the snap, so it’s harder for defenses to read what the offense is doing. In other words, cosmetics designed to deceive. Adding those things is not a massive undertaking - the concept of motion and shifts is not foreign to players. On top of those things, Moore can add some of his own plays and wrinkles, and the offense can look very different.
I still don’t recall the term “space age”, and I don’t recall any discussion of him doing things that have never been done before, or creating plays nobody has ever dreamed of. I think that’s a large exaggeration on your part.