What I don't get is how some people can be comfortable at, say, $36m but not, say, $41m.
What exactly do people think the team is going to do with that $5m? Are we worried about having enough money for a kicker and punter? Someone please answer this for me. Difference-making players make $10m minimum.
That’s a pretty good point. But look at it this way...the team is going to be hard pressed to win with Dak even at $35M per year. At $41-42M it gets prohibitive.
If you compare guys like Rodgers, Peyton Manning, etc to Tom Brady, what is the real difference? APY on their contracts.
Manning and Rodgers suffocated their teams with their contracts. Both should be neck and neck with Brady in terms of SB wins but they are not. I know The Hoodie is part of that, but I think the salary cap is the biggest reason NE has all those SBs.
The Hoodie ruthlessly moved on from players and managed to keep a very good team together for a long time. The rest are cyclical at best.
If we sign Dak for $40m, we have a two year window to win, or get really lucky in the draft. Otherwise the window closes.
I want Dak to be a Cowboy but this whole thing is stupid on Dak’s part. He is pissing off tons of endorsements by ensuring we can’t assemble a long term team around him without quite a bit of luck.