And the guy has the nerve to claim he's a good coach. After comments like and his displays of his personality on here many times it has become far too late for his "I'm a good coach" claims to be convincing.
And I would add that if Dak takes this to a SB, reward and extend him.
Sorry brother....i disagree with you. I need the follow up data to get on board.
I responded to the part of your comment that the Cowboys will have the option of trading Prescott after next season. They don't, because of the no-trade clause.
If Dak were bi-polar the worst thing we could of done is play a system where he had to wait and ponder on routes and receivers getting open. His anxiety would build and could well lead him into making/forcing poor decision and throws that we'rent there. A quicker WCO would be more beneficial as it doesnt give time to enhance uncertainty.
I don't consider signing undrafted rookie free agents and bringing in guys like Anthony Wright or Ryan Leaf as actually "trying". Spending a 2nd on Quincy when he was a projected 4th-5th rounder is not what I consider trying though it was probably the best shot they gave it.
He stepped up in a game where his kicker missed all his kicks. Defense played its *** off too. But like I've told you before with this discussion the Bucs were a playoff team and many people picked the Cowboys to lose this game. Now that they've won they were suppose to win. Still a playoff team. This team lost to the Jaguars and struggled to beat the Colts and Texans. You nor them are in any position to care who they beat in the playoffs as long as they do it.
Ok. I am just saying the Cowboys could take a quarterback. Teams have ate big contracts before. The Cowboys did with Romo, the Eagles with Wentz and now the Packers.
If you want to contend Dak gives us the best chance. Is that a "must"? I don't know. But something tells me Jerry is not in the business to wait for a rookie QB to develop in 3 or 4 years. Which would be 5 or 6 years from now. Its just not realistic.
If he plays as he did last year (not saying he will) then it's highly debatable that he'll provide the best chance. How come we'll have to wait 3/4 years to develop the rookie....Dak hit the ground running, because the roster was built. You're mistaking the draft pick QB's that picked up by teams that are in the process of a rebuild.
Nah, that’s not true.
Oh of course. This is contingent on last year being an anomaly. Though we did win 12 games with him winning 8 of them based on him leading the league in picks. Will this team be upset If they in a ring next year with him leading the league in interceptions like Matt Stafford did a few years back? But I think the plan is that Dak is somewhere around 3800-4k/30 TD/10 interception guy.
This ignores two things.
Overrated?? Didnt that 2016 Offense have 6 first round picks?
Hang on a second, Dak hasnt even got us to a Championship game, unlike those youngsters: Burrows, Allen, Hurts and Purdy.
Both Roethlisberger and Wilson had great success starting their NFL careers.
Not following what your actual point is?
Not sure if they did but I know the year prior those 6 first round picks won 4 games. Also worth noting that 3 of those picks were on the offensive line I'm sure in Martin, Tyron and Fredericks.
I acknowledged those two. Also worth noting that those are two guys and probably future hall of famers. That is not the standard for rookie QB's.
