Why I stopped caring about Player Contracts

Jarntt

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,943
Reaction score
6,558
To my knowledge and I Could be wrong here but they haven't even gotten Zeke's savings yet. He was a post June 1st cut.

So they were able to trade for Cooks and Gillmore WITH or WITHOUT Zeke being cut. They could've been making these types of moves but the problem is they didn't value this type of team building until I guess they saw the Eagles make it to a SB.
Correct Zeke was designated post 6/1. you asked about last year, not this year. The carry over helped pay for those guys. Plus when bringing up a prior year specifically and when asking 'if they had Zeke's $13M what would they spend it on' it seemed as you were talking in general so I gave you examples of what they use cap space on meaning if they cut
 

CouchCoach

Staff member
Messages
41,122
Reaction score
74,959
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
You should care about contracts. Great example is Zeke's. When they pay these guy, they want to feature them. Which keeps more talented and cheaper players like Pollard on the bench. Its not just about money.

Only a casual fan would not care about contracts and who gets paid what.
And knowing all of this helps you how?

And I completely disagree about that fan part because I am a fan of the sports side, not the business side.
 

Jarntt

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,943
Reaction score
6,558
No team has a roster full of all pros and pro bowlers.

There are role players, jags, etc.

What makes their jags better than our jags? You replace one with the other.

And you don't go spending FA money to fill up backup positions. So how are these guys better than ours? How much more will they cost? How much more will they give you? And who do u lose because you spend a lot of money thru FA

It's been proven 100 times over. You fill gaps in the roster. Maybe sign a rental for a last push. But you don't build a team through FA. Doesn't work.
Now you are just changing the discussion. The point was there are impact players that aren't past their prime or JAGs that are signed via free agency. That is what you said that I disagreed with
 

BoyzBlaster

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,873
Reaction score
3,719
Every single year there are a bunch of players that leave as free agents and are expected to start for other teams. The Eagles alone lost five in part because they couldn't afford to re-sign them: Hargraves, CJGJ, Seumalo, Sanders and Dillard. League wide there are many players I would call potential impact players for us that leave their previous team via free agency or trade that could make us much better. I'm not stating we should be singing any or all of them, but the idea that only older, ineffective and past their prime players make it to free agency is off base IMO. This year I think had a little less than usual. It doesn't have to be an Aaron Donald to make your team better and be a difference maker
TJ Edwards was another really good player they lost in FA. I was hoping we'd let Poodle Hunter walk and replace him with Edwards.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
And knowing all of this helps you how?

And I completely disagree about that fan part because I am a fan of the sports side, not the business side.
Knowing all what?

Nothing wrong with being a casual fan. Many of us care about and like to debate the details.

What and which players gets paid directly affects the success of the team so its important to hard core fans.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,528
Reaction score
76,367
Just told you. 60-40 or 70-30. Zeke would have been cut long ago and not resigned.

Probably would have started out 50/50 his rookie year. Would have let Zeke hold out in Cabo Pollard rookie year and featured him while Zeke held out. Would have drafted another young back to team with Pollard.
So is it a coincidence that two of our losses came last year when we have Pollard 18+ carries?
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,119
Reaction score
20,695
Translation, the cap doesn't matter as much as some people would like it to matter. But it does matter. Or else we'd see stacked teams every year like we did in the 80s and 90s.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
33,933
Reaction score
19,490
Now you are just changing the discussion. The point was there are impact players that aren't past their prime or JAGs that are signed via free agency. That is what you said that I disagreed with
Never said there weren't. Who? How many of them are available? How much they cos r? Which goes back to my initial argument. Good ones are resigned and kept by their original teams. Most who hit the market are older, injury history, and want a big contract.

Again, you fill a gap you couldn't otherwise for a short term and a lot of money.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,528
Reaction score
76,367
Correct Zeke was designated post 6/1. you asked about last year, not this year. The carry over helped pay for those guys. Plus when bringing up a prior year specifically and when asking 'if they had Zeke's $13M what would they spend it on' it seemed as you were talking in general so I gave you examples of what they use cap space on meaning if they cut
Yeah but they didn't need to release anyone to get Gilmore and Cooks. Restructuring deals allowed that.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,528
Reaction score
76,367
Translation, the cap doesn't matter as much as some people would like it to matter. But it does matter. Or else we'd see stacked teams every year like we did in the 80s and 90s.
In theory yes. I can't speak for the OP but for me when I say the cap doesn't matter I mean it in regards to building your team. You can't have everyone make max money but no team is stacked enough to even have that be a worry.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
80,625
Reaction score
101,286
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I'm sure we wanted to keep Cedric Wilson last year but couldn't because of Dak's contract. We all saw the result.
Right, a few harp on Zeke's contract, when Dak's is much worse.
But we are talking agendas and narratives there. :popcorn:

Zeke did not live up to his contract, and playing injured with a handicap at OC did not help. Dak certainly did not live up to his contract either. We will see if he does with a 30% change in offense.
Hopefully a better OL as well.
I do understand and agree, it was best to move on from Zeke. But if Dak repeats from last year, they should follow up on that as well.
 

Jumbo075

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,042
Reaction score
7,535
The biggest impact on rising NFL salaries is not the top limit of the Salary Cap, but the bottom limit. Teams are REQUIRED to spend a certain percentage of income on player salaries. So, as the league revenue goes up, the salaries of average and below average players also goes up. Another impact of the Salary CAP is that it shortens the careers of players. It also guarantees profitability for small market teams. Finally, in case anyone has forgotten how lopsided most Super Bowls were prior to the Salary CAP, it makes the games more competitive - which raises ratings. The actual salaries of individual players is incidental to the reason the Salary CAP is in place.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Right, a few harp on Zeke's contract, when Dak's is much worse.
But we are talking agendas and narratives there. :popcorn:

Zeke did not live up to his contract, and playing injured with a handicap at OC did not help. Dak certainly did not live up to his contract either. We will see if he does with a 30% change in offense.
Hopefully a better OL as well.
I do understand and agree, it was best to move on from Zeke. But if Dak repeats from last year, they should follow up on that as well.
Much different. I shouldnt have to explain this to you.

Dak plays the most important position in football and there was no better QB on the roster. Dak does his job better than Zeke does.

Zeke on the other hand sucks at what he does and plays one of the least important positions in football. Not to mention we had a better RB on the roster to play.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
80,625
Reaction score
101,286
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Knowing all what?

Nothing wrong with being a casual fan. Many of us care about and like to debate the details.

What and which players gets paid directly affects the success of the team so its important to hard core fans.
There are many hardcore fans that do not give a crap about the pay. So if one doesn't care, they are less of a fan?
Before the salary cap how did you distinguish a hardcore fan vs. a casual fan?

Same before the explosion of the internet, and now social media, to find out any thing one could that was going on. All we had was a local newspaper, or the USA Today.
Hard to get good info if not in the area. At least they had The Dallas Cowboys weekly, which I subscribed to.
So if a fan subscribed to it, they were hardcore but if not they were casual?
 

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,806
Reaction score
21,725
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Have you finally realized that Dallas' front office isn't based on end results?

And you're right about the Hurts contract - he isn't worth that much money, but at least he reached a super bowl before getting the deal. What was on Dak's resume before he got paid? Regular season stats?
star on his helmet??
 

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,806
Reaction score
21,725
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
That isn't how QB's get paid. The next one always gets more than the last one. Been that way for years. Lamar, Burrow, Herbert will be next.
It sucks, but hey that's the going rate, by next year someone will be making 60 million
 

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,806
Reaction score
21,725
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Right, a few harp on Zeke's contract, when Dak's is much worse.
But we are talking agendas and narratives there. :popcorn:

Zeke did not live up to his contract, and playing injured with a handicap at OC did not help. Dak certainly did not live up to his contract either. We will see if he does with a 30% change in offense.
Hopefully a better OL as well.
I do understand and agree, it was best to move on from Zeke. But if Dak repeats from last year, they should follow up on that as well.
Is that before or after they resign him???
 
Top