Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 78,835
- Reaction score
- 103,565
It's not the terms of the rules that is the problem. Wrong doing should be punished but not until it is verified. Somehow public opinion that is driven my the media's unsubstantiated narrative matters to the commish... it's what got Brady suspended last year.
Has he been punished yet? No. Even though he's done plenty of "wrong" to one degree or another.
Why are you conflating "bad decisions" with law breaking? I didn't say he was making good decisions, I said he didn't break any laws. You are once again jumping to conclusion and now attempting to divert that folly to someone else. I'm not the one fool enough to get sucked into the media spin and think it amounts to a hill of beans. I don't care how long that list of "bad decisions" gets as long as he's not breaking the law he should be allowed to make all the "bad decisions" he wants to make. Who elected you the executor of what is or isn't a good decision?
Brady didn't break any laws either, how did it work out for him?
Likewise, who elected you? And apparently, you're "fool enough" to want to absolve him of any wrongdoing or make excuses for him because you're a fan. The only standards you get to lower are your own.
You don't get to decide what's acceptable, the owners and management of the league do. And if you or Elliott don't like it, feel free to do something else.