Fouts played in one of the best Offenses there ever was in the NFL. I don't think he was better, per say. I think he was a better passer. I think he has much better statistics. I think he retired as one of the all time, statistics wise, QBs in NFL History. I think Fouts went on to have a successful career in broadcasting so he has that benefit as well. On the other hand, Plunkett played most of his prime on bad teams. He retired and you never heard much else on Plunkett. Was Plunkett better then Fouts? Well, Plunkett might have been better if he had an opportunity to go to a good team earlier on in his career. Most people never really saw Plunkett at his peak. When he got to the Raiders, he was pretty beaten up already. Yet he still managed to win. I don't know if he was better or not but I don't think it matters. As I said earlier, I don't think Eli is better then Tony but I also don't think that matters. It is what it is, like it or not.