jchocolate82;1810768 said:
Get outta her man. I'm peeved that the Pats won this game and it is what it is but you gotta be joking me if you think the Pats have not had some questionable calls go there way this whole season
You meant get outta
here man.
Second, you guys must have a silo with straw in it or something. We're talking about
THIS game so why would you introduce the argument that the Pats have benefited from some questionable calls. Of course, they have, as many teams have, including the Cowboys with the pass interference on Miles Austin.
Wait, that was
OBVIOUSLY a pass interference call, even though the ref closest to the play didn't drop a flag and it took almost a minute for another ref to call the penalty?
Pulease. Questionable calls abound in the NFL, not just for the Pats but for many teams. I'm looking at the Cleveland-Arizona game and many questionable calls were made in that game.
Be that as it may, Gaffney caught the ball for a TD. He snagged it and then switched the ball after he went out of bounds. And the penalty against the Ravens for holding Watson was a good call. And even if it wasn't, it wasn't so egregious that it would have been an extremely bad call.
And I find it interesting in the article posted in this thread, the Ravens never really say which calls were bad, only that the refs want to perserve the Pats undefeated record. But they offer no proof. I guess that's what passes for proof these days - wild speculation and perspectives tainted with bias, the bias that comes when people are so upset about the Patriots possibly going 16-0 that they make excuses why teams can't beat them.