Zeke Injunction Thread *** UPDATE: Injunction Denied ***

[links18]

Maybe I'm too optimistic, but it sounds like she's taking into consideration of other court opinions regarding irreparable harm. If true, to me it makes sense that she's also taking into consideration that the other court also granted the injunction as well. So maybe instead of starting off at square one and hearing the arguments, she's starting at the other courts granted it, and now tell me why they were wrong. To me that's an advantage for Zeke.

That would be the equitable thing to do, but who knows.

 

[Corso]

Meh...don’t take him serious but why lie?

Me rikey Marcus. He's good people.

 

[Jake]

Risen is not an Eagles fan. He is a puppet master. And, his show amuses me.

He's the joke you've heard a thousand times before. He bores me.

 

[Melonfeud]

We don't need Zeke! He's fat and outta shape, remember.

But .. but .. he's OUR fat and outta shape guy!!

LoL. You guys ought to 'blow up' that picture @Boyzmamacita posted yesterday of #21 with his jersey rolled up on the first page of the cowboy tweets,,,CHECK OUT the set of his EYES,,,while tuning in the twilight zone theme,,,it's a little bit creepy in a demonic possessed sorta way

 

[Verdict]

All that tells me is that stuff is in the hands of a person who thinks what they're thinking at the moment upon things.
the arguments only go so far.
Too much subject for translation and interpretation here for things to be truly fair.

Here's a drink for the Best.

Which direction a judge starts looking at a decision often leads to a result. Decisions are seldom clear cut. That's why the framing of the issue is so important.

If a judge is scrutinizing this from the commissions powers standpoint Zeke has a lesser chance of winning than if they look at it from a we need to give this process time to get it right standpoint. If they look at it from the latter point of view Zeke will be granted the injunction. There really is no reason NOT to grant the injunction.

 

[Silver N Blue]

Meh...don’t take him serious but why lie?

Man I hope this is true.

 

[MrMavsMan]

Meh...don’t take him serious but why lie?

lol sorry, i'm hoping for the best but I doubt this guy has a source close to the judge and just trying to be a "first" on a 50/50 guess.

 

[Reality]

Meh...don’t take him serious but why lie?

This is how future "experts" get followers and interviews You take a chance, make a claim and if it pans out, you get attention. If it doesn't, people forget quickly.

 

[River82]

Meh...don’t take him serious but why lie?

"Good source" is a subjective statement. He wouldn't lie, but his bias may interfere with his reasoning. Could be true, may not be, we can't draw any conclusions from it though.

 

[TWOK11]

Everyone with legitimate legal insight is posting/tweeting he'll get the injunction as if it's always been a given.

Would shock literally everyone who can intelligently speak on this matter if it went the other way.

 

[robjay04]

That is strange... Only person who knows is the judge

She could’ve already told people for all we know.

 

[viman96]

Meh...don’t take him serious but why lie?

Let's hope it's not the same source that told Jerry there'd be no suspension! ;-)

 

[PA Cowboy Fan]

There isn't going to be a work stoppage over this. The CBA still has 3 full years left and no one in 2020 is going to care about what happened to Elliott today.

There will be other cases over the next 3 years. Goodell just can't help himself.

 

[Doomsday]

 

[Reality]

lol sorry, i'm hoping for the best but I doubt this guy has a source close to the judge and just trying to be a "first" on a 50/50 guess.

There's absolutely no way this guy has a source.

 

[links18]

Meh...don’t take him serious but why lie?

Who is he?

 

[Verdict]

He is an idiot. A judge can do whatever he or she wants to do within reason.

 

[Ghost12]

Meh...don’t take him serious but why lie?

Because he is making a prediction based on what he believes is going to happen in order to fool people into thinking he has some sort of "inside source." I've been predicting the same thing for 2 months now regarding all the injunction hearings.

The only people who know the ruling are the judge herself and her clerks who are furiously typing up the opinion. I don't believe a bleacherreport person has any inside sources at the NY district court.

 

[Corso]

Which direction a judge starts looking at a decision often leads to a result. Decisions are seldom clear cut. That's why the framing of the issue is so important.

If a judge is scrutinizing this from the commissions powers standpoint Zeke has a lesser chance of winning than if they look at it from a we need to give this process time to get it right standpoint. If they look at it from the latter point of view Zeke will be granted the injunction. There really is no reason NOT to grant the injunction.

I always liked you...

 

[theebs]

"Good source" is a subjective statement. He wouldn't lie, but his bias may interfere with his reasoning. Could be true, may not be, we can't draw any conclusions from it though.

These look at me I am sourced up guys all can’t help themselves. Everyone of these guys on twitter claim to know things based on these “sources”

Spoiler alert they never know just like no one else does.