TheRomoSexual
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,057
- Reaction score
- 4,958
Within 2 yrs Elliott will be the NFL's leading rusher!!
I wouldn't be surprised if he ends up being the rushing leader this year.
Within 2 yrs Elliott will be the NFL's leading rusher!!
Show me an example of a rookie RB drafted top 5 into a system with a premiere NFL offense and I will gladly make the comparison.Yes, you can't provide a single example in the last 10 years of a rookie RB doing markedly better in his first three games, but that's okay sunshine. You just stick to your guns, the BB guns that they are.
Show me an example of a rookie RB drafted top 5 into a system with premiere NFL offense and I will gladly make the comparison.
In the meantime keeping making up childish insults that add nothing to your argument nor make you sound very bright. That should work.
Yes, he's obviously better. Do you really not see how absurd you're being comparing a vet to Zeke, a rookie who is undeniably improving each week? He is literally doing better in his first three games than E. Smith and Adrian Peterson did in their first three games. People's expectations are way, way out of whack and out of touch with reality. And we did not need defensive help far more than a RB -- McFadden and Morris, while both fine pieces, were never the answer. We are a much better team with a solid run game, and Zeke will establish that for years.
Just as I figured. You claim your expectations aren't out of whack, but you literally can't point to a single counterexample. Good night, sweet Prince. I shall my enjoy my victory the rest of the eve.
I'm pretty sure after playing .500 ball for 20 years we haven't even come close to doing anything like that.I'm pretty sure there are few on here that would find something to ***** about if we went 19-0 and added the 6th Lombardi.
Still upset that everyone is liking my post calling your drafting hypocrisy out, eh? I'm sorry sweetie.
You actually didn't. All your post showed was that you can't think beyond very basic concepts.
Point out a RB drafted into a top 5 NFL offense and I will happily compare them.
Gurley is was drafted into a dumpster fire as was AP. Gurley would have been an MVP his rookie year in this system with Dak or Romo at QB.
What exactly do you want me to compare his sub 4 YPC too?
And "victory?" What are you, 12?
BTW, Todd Gurley, with a crap offensive line:Yes, you can't provide a single example in the last 10 years of a rookie RB doing markedly better in his first three games, but that's okay sunshine. You just stick to your guns, the BB guns that they are.
Whatever you say, chief. Everyone disagrees with you, but you keep fighting the good fight.
Everyone? All the hundreds of posters here disagree with me?
And if you look at the people who liked your post, most are front office apologists and/or known Elliott wonks. But yeah........ Everyone.
BTW, Todd Gurley, with a crap offensive line:
2nd game 146 yards, 7.7 YPC again ARIZONA.
3rd, 159 yards, 5.3 YPC, AT GB
4th game, 128 yards, 6.7 YPC against CLE
5th game, 133 yards, 6.7 YPC against SF
This is with a craptastic OLine and Case Keenum at QB. And Gurley was drafted 10th, not 4th.
Tell me again about his historic "fantastic" start.
Yes, all 20 of them fit that description. Are you sure your tinfoil hat isn't too tight?
Yeah. Pretty much all of them tend to make excuses for the front office or were huge Elliott fans.
Any person that suggests a tail back was more important than fixing the defense needs their head examined.
I listened the entire time I read your response and heard nothing...so groundbreaking was a bit of an overstatement. To be fair my fan is on so...
3.9 YPC. 3.6 before playing the anemic and injured Bears. That would be a single counter point to Zeke not being off to a fantastic start.