Jeff Heath haters

RoboQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,687
Reaction score
9,772
Some posters just desperately need Heath to not be awful.

He is, but their dreams and beliefs need to be justified.

Awful? He's awful now?

Look, you can say he's average. That's debatable. You can call him a fringe player while trying to hide your
unexplainable hatred. But to call him awful just makes a person sound like some drunk that's 3 sheets in the wind
before halftime. You're better than that, Chris.
 

MyUnderAppreciatedQB

Active Member
Messages
170
Reaction score
156
I think Heath gets a bad rap, but there were alot of rookies playing in front of him causing him to overcompensate thus being " out of position ". On the other hand the guy takes terrible angles toward ball carriers which can be fixed. Currently, the LB position has a much more glaring need than the safety position.
 

MyUnderAppreciatedQB

Active Member
Messages
170
Reaction score
156
I think Heath gets a bad rap, but there were alot of rookies playing in front of him causing him to overcompensate thus being " out of position ". On the other hand the guy takes terrible angles toward ball carriers which can be fixed. Currently, the LB position has a much more glaring need than the safety position.
 

SoupcanSam

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,104
Reaction score
7,244



If you still hate him then you are just stubborn. I haven’t seen a cowboy safety make this many plays on the ball since......Roy/Woodson. And many of you thought Wilcox bum *** was better just because politics had him starting over Heath. The play in the video with Wilcox trying to take away Heaths interception is fitting. Some of you just hate being wrong. It’s quite sad. Like the guy in the video said, if it’s luck how come Byron rarely gets (lucky)? :thumbup:


The only place heath belongs is on ST, asking us do we want paper/plastic, or biggie fries with that?
 

Irvin88_4life

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,492
Reaction score
26,367
Some players are labeled on one play. Romo the botched field goal made him a choker, Heath being trucked by Peterson at the goall line. I don’t think many look past that one play

I never thought he was tricked by Peterson. If another cowboy wouldn’t have come in and hit them I thinkenhenwouldnhave held Peterson
I think most dislike Heath because of Calvin Johnson not Peterson
 

Big D

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,071
Reaction score
3,735
My honest opinion of JH. He's ok. He gives good effort and is often in the right place but sometimes just a step behind. He would be awesome if we beefed up the front seven it would allow him to shine the problem is, we seem to be content with Jags in front seven. The D line is looking better but now we need to bolster the LB corps.
 

BlindFaith

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,047
Reaction score
2,519
My honest opinion of JH. He's ok. He gives good effort and is often in the right place but sometimes just a step behind. He would be awesome if we beefed up the front seven it would allow him to shine the problem is, we seem to be content with Jags in front seven. The D line is looking better but now we need to bolster the LB corps.

The problem with Heath is that he is not instinctive, he is not sudden/twitchy and he looks for the knockout shot, mostly at the detriment of himself and his own players.

He is not a playmaker. He allows the play to come to him. Lacks that aggressive approach.

Instinctual players know when to take a risk. The really good ones have those risks payoff far more often than not.

Heath gets paid at what he's worth. Unfortunately for us, that's not even in the top 50 for all safeties.

I could live with a combination of him and Woods as long as they are paired with someone like Reid or Bates, or best case, James.
 

KingintheNorth

Chris in Arizona
Messages
17,747
Reaction score
24,484
Awful? He's awful now?

Look, you can say he's average. That's debatable. You can call him a fringe player while trying to hide your
unexplainable hatred. But to call him awful just makes a person sound like some drunk that's 3 sheets in the wind
before halftime. You're better than that, Chris.

He reacts to balls too slowly. There are too many plays where he either stays true centerfield too long and is late getting over to the ball. At other times, he guesses early and wrong, which then makes the read very easy for the opposing quarterback. He does not have good instincts for the position IMO and he's a liability in deep ball coverage. He will occasionally destroy someone about to run out of bounds or find his way to a tipped ball, but not nearly enough to merit the acclaim some fans here are willing to give him. He should not be a starting safety in the NFL and if he remains one for us, will cost us games. If we are serious about contending for a Super Bowl, that position has to be upgraded.
 

jwitten82

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,148
Reaction score
13,995
I thought that all you would have, of course. You tried using box stats to compare DBs lmao. How moronic

And if you read it, it wasnt just PFF two sources were quoted. Two sources that obviously watch more closely than yoh.
Lmao, at those horrible sources and you still being wrong...Heath has more turnovers than Sendejo you busta
 

ejthedj

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,290
Reaction score
619
He’s a nice 3rd safety. That’s it. This team should upgrade the starting S positions if possible.

Heath is an average to above average starter in this league. He starts on 22 teams is my guess, maybe more. He is so criminally underrated on this board it's comical. He takes bad angles sometimes, but he got so much better at that the second half of the year. But he's smart. Violent. And has a knack for making turnovers. Can't ask for more. We need one starter, and if Frazier keeps progressing, maybe none. Or Woods
 

Redball Express

All Aboard!!!
Messages
16,253
Reaction score
12,758



If you still hate him then you are just stubborn. I haven’t seen a cowboy safety make this many plays on the ball since......Roy/Woodson. And many of you thought Wilcox bum *** was better just because politics had him starting over Heath. The play in the video with Wilcox trying to take away Heaths interception is fitting. Some of you just hate being wrong. It’s quite sad. Like the guy in the video said, if it’s luck how come Byron rarely gets (lucky)? :thumbup:

No hate.

If you watch his videos..

he is articulate..

Committed..

and is all for the team.

He is not as effective in pass coverage as you would like.

And he lays wood when he gets in front of you.

You need guys like that.

If the rest of the secondary improves..

there are ways to roll coverage to him.

I think he is sort of a Charlie Waters type.
 

ejthedj

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,290
Reaction score
619
I think Heath gets a bad rap, but there were alot of rookies playing in front of him causing him to overcompensate thus being " out of position ". On the other hand the guy takes terrible angles toward ball carriers which can be fixed. Currently, the LB position has a much more glaring need than the safety position.

He got much better at the angles as the year went on. His FIRST YEAR AS A STARTER, mind you. But this board thinks he sucks cause they remember the bad plays. And not the like 20 turnovers he caused in the video, for some reason. In mostly limited playing time
 

DanA

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,974
Reaction score
5,791
"
Two years ago, the #Vikings took a chance on Sendejo with a 4-yr deal.

It's paid off big time. Last year he was @PFF's #11 safety. The #NFL1000 had him as the 5th-best FS, one spot ahead of Earl Thomas.

Now they have a near pro-bowl-caliber safety under contract for pennies: https://t.co/ZjoEKlmVCK"


Gtfoh hahah

So using PFF as you have here, how has Jeff Heath compare?

That's cool

He's not close to Crawford or Bjones
Morris, Hanna, and Wilson aren't starters
Scandrick, Durant, and Cooper arent on the team

BJones PFF- 76.8
Crawford PFF - 83.6
Terence Williams - 58.5
Malik Collins - 46.8
Jeff Heath - 80.8

So by your own criteria Heath isn’t even close to the weakest link and probably grades out as the 4th or 5th best guy on the defense.
 

stilltheguru88

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,737
Reaction score
6,243
So using PFF as you have here, how has Jeff Heath compare?



BJones PFF- 76.8
Crawford PFF - 83.6
Terence Williams - 58.5
Malik Collins - 46.8
Jeff Heath - 80.8

So by your own criteria Heath isn’t even close to the weakest link and probably grades out as the 4th or 5th best guy on the defense.
:lmao:
 

Cowpolk

Landry Hat
Messages
18,851
Reaction score
28,794
My honest opinion of JH. He's ok. He gives good effort and is often in the right place but sometimes just a step behind. He would be awesome if we beefed up the front seven it would allow him to shine the problem is, we seem to be content with Jags in front seven. The D line is looking better but now we need to bolster the LB corps.
O line needs a big mean dude with a bad attitude in the middle And we need 1 linebacker with the same attitude Fix the defensive line and the secondary will get better Would be nice to draft a good safety or corner
 
Top