Denim Chicken
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 15,353
- Reaction score
- 23,950
Dak is not a 30+ td qb, even if he had the talent around him.
Dak had 29 TDs in 16' and 28 TDs in 17', so he's pretty close.
Dak is not a 30+ td qb, even if he had the talent around him.
Dak had 29 TDs in 16' and 28 TDs in 17'
They are counting the 6 rushing TDs in each seasonHigher than I thought, I take that back then.
They are counting the 6 rushing TDs in each season
Dak had four TDs in two games last yearAnd Wentz had 4 tds in one game last year. Do I get to also pretend he broke the all time td record because of that? Never ever credit a player for something he has not accomplished. Woulda coulda shoulda is not a tracked stat.
Bell report yet?I always suspected he was a better QB than Joe Montana or Tom Brady - now we have definitive proof.
Didn't say it was wrong, but I'm pretty sure he was looking at passing TDs vs ints, as that was part of the conversation.Of course. They are TDs scored by the QB.
Dak had four TDs in two games last year
26 against 31. And his 26 games came 3 & 4 years in the league, not straight out the gate as a rookie 4th round pick, if we’re being honest. Romo’s were great still, obviously.So counting only 26 games instead of 32 is honest?
ok
Fumbles and lost fumbles are an inconsistent stat on PFR. If you find reliable numbers, feel free to add them.Didn't say it was wrong, but I'm pretty sure he was looking at passing TDs vs ints, as that was part of the conversation.
I notice rushing Tds are counted, btw, but fumbles are not.
Not bashing Dak at all here. Just saying that if they count one, then they should count the other.
lol - why wouldn't they?They are counting the 6 rushing TDs in each season
It’s the same conversation for RBs. Marshall Faulk is half the RB if you only count rushing stats.Personally, I think when judging a QB, passing TDs are a bit more valid. Who's to say that Zeke couldn't get the rushing TDs, for example. But he sure won't get the passing TDs.
That's another topic though. Not worth debating it
I notice rushing Tds are counted, btw, but fumbles are not.
Not bashing Dak at all here. Just saying that if they count one, then they should count the other.
Yeah. I get it. And fumbles can come from something other than actually rushing.Fumbles and lost fumbles are an inconsistent stat on PFR. If you find reliable numbers, feel free to add them.
I wouldn't agree with that, but I get your point.It’s the same conversation for RBs. Marshall Faulk is half the RB if you only count rushing stats.
Personally, I think when judging a QB, passing TDs are a bit more valid. Who's to say that Zeke couldn't get the rushing TDs, for example. But he sure won't get the passing TDs.
That's another topic though. Not worth debating it
It's misleading, especially since there's no context to any of the numbers. You're putting Dak in company that he, quite simply, doesn't belong in by picking and choosing stats.I didn’t know passing yards & touchdowns counted more than rushing yards & touchdowns. Does one rushing yard equal a half a yard? Or maybe one rushing TD equals 3 points?
I guess if I had a QB formula, I might give rushing TDs less weight. I would never discount it entirely, or even close.It's not more valid bc QBs have different skills. Some QBs are more mobile than others. Why handicap their advantage in comparison?