Anyone but skin homers really think

[Hostile]

thats not saying much when there are only 20,000 people in the stadium

That's only when they play the Skins. When Dallas comes to town it is always a sellout.

If I remember right up until last year they had only had 10 or so home sellouts where the opponent was someone other than the Cowboys. The Cowboys games have sold out every year.

It's one of the reasons why Bidwell voted against the realignment. He was losing his 1 guaranteed home sellout every year.

Now, you and some of your chorts may think I'm just saying this to pick on you but you'd be wrong. None of the above was a joke.

 

[superpunk]

If you'd pay attention and not get your panties in a twist you might be able to follow along.

I can't type any slower so maybe you should just read my posts two or three times.

I've tried that. Unfortunately, your drivel doesn't become any more clear no matter how many times you read it.

Any other suggestions, Norman?

 

[riggo]

Cooley is an average yet solid HB.

cooley caught more balls than any other non-WR in the NFC. not to mention 7 TD's.

sure. he is 'average'.

He has never consistently played at ProBowl level within his role.

"he has never consistently...."???

he just finished his second year. and you live in DC? what is your excuse?

 

[illone]

I've tried that. Unfortunately, your drivel doesn't become any more clear no matter how many times you read it.

Any other suggestions, Norman?

Then I guess there isn't much hope for you. Move along, grasshopper.

 

[5Stars]

You are a funny guy, superpunk. But really, your dumb pictures are lame and serve no purpose for this thread.

I'm not a troll simply because I think my receiving corps is better than yours ON PAPER. I've said countless times that the game is played on the field and has yet to be proven who really is better. Not sure what more you want than that. You continually try to spin things into an argument but there is nothing to argue about. We're better on paper means absolutely nothing to anyone. It's a debate about nothing.

Ok, I got to side with illone on this!

If you look at the recievers on his team, you can clearly see, using "logic", that they are indeed better on paper...

Toilet paper!

RedStink logic, handed down from St. Gibbs and Art from ES, to the sheep of the RedStinks...paper champs...toilet paper champs for the last 7 or 8 years since Lil Snyder did everyone a favor and bought that joke of a team and their little Marching Band!

So, yes, illone is right...paper....

:dissskin: Good dog, Gibbs, good dog...!!

 

[superpunk]

Then I guess there isn't much hope for you. Move along, grasshopper.

Apparently not.

My hopes of understanding skewed-troll logic were never very strong to begin with, but you've crushed them completely.

Wear that badge with pride, Norman.

 

[illone]

Apparently not.

My hopes of understanding skewed-troll logic were never very strong to begin with, but you've crushed them completely.

Wear that badge with pride, Norman.

Yea, because you're known as the most logical poster. haha.

What are you going to say when we beat you again this season?

 

[Hostile]

Look who's talking, to say Moss will NEVER be on the same level of T.O. is just being a homer.

No it isn't.

I'm not a homer and I'll say it. I'd have said it when TO was an Eagle.

I'd have said it when he was a 49er.

Santana Moss is a very good WR, but Terrell Owens, love him or hate him, is a level above that at elite. He's been there for a long time. I'm not a fan of the guy, but give him his due as far as talent. He is one of the top 3 or 4 WRs in the NFL.

It's fine to be excited about Moss. I would be too in your shoes. But don't go too far.

 

[superpunk]

Yea, because you're known as the most logical poster. haha.

No. I'm not. There's an entire host of posters smarter and more logical than me.

You're not one of them.

What are you going to say when we beat you again this season?

Darn? Shoot? Bullocks? 14 out of 18 ain't bad?

Fortunately, I don't have to worry about that.

 

[Hostile]

What are you going to say when we beat you again this season?

Personally I'll say congratulations, but then sportsmanship means something to me.

In the meantime I'll join your trash talk and say what I said to one of your cohorts last week.

We've outplayed you in every decade head to head. So take your "we swept you in 2005" nonsense, stand in our shadow, and shiver from the cold.

 

[superpunk]

We've outplayed you in every decade head to head. So take your "we swept you in 2005" nonsense, stand in our shadow, and shiver from the cold.

Ow.

The aftershock of that smack hurt the whole way over here....

 

[illone]

We've outplayed you in every decade head to head. So take your "we swept you in 2005" nonsense, stand in our shadow, and shiver from the cold.

I'm still getting used to the word sweep. Haven't been able to say that since 95.

No shivering going on after what happened last year.

 

[5Stars]

Ow.

The aftershock of that smack hurt the whole way over here....

I still have a blackeye from when Hostile said it the first time to that other poster!

And, I'm a Cowboy fan!! :laugh2:

 

[superpunk]

I'm still getting used to the word sweep. Haven't been able to say that since 95.

Don't worry, sonny-jep....we're ALL still getting used to the Skins not being the league's (and to a greater extent, OUR) whipping post. For one year at least.

Even a blind squirrel....

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Patten and fasano. I mean how many backup TEs get that much recognition in the passing game? But, it depends on how they are used.

exactly, and Fasano will be used far often than Patten will, I'm going to say Fasano ends up having twice the # of rec. and yards as Patten in '06

 

[illone]

Go ahead, write it off as nonsesne. You can pretend the biggest loss in the rivalries history didn't sting, but I guarantee it stung Big Tuna.

 

[5Stars]

I'm still getting used to the word sweep. Haven't been able to say that since 95.

No shivering going on after what happened last year.

How about the word "sheep", rather then sweep?

Also, learn the word "squeek"...because that's exactely what your team did in the first game last year! Those two lucky "squeek" plays will not happen again, if if not for them, you vocabulary would still not have the word "sweep" in them...

McSlob scrambled for 15 minutes on the Cowboys in a game...he will never do that again, ever! Remember what happened to him last year when he played the Cowboys...?

So, take your little broom, sit out on the porch, and "sweep" all day long...and live in "happy land"...with the rest of the RedStink "sheep"...

 

[riggo]

So take your "we swept you in 2005" nonsense, stand in our shadow, and shiver from the cold.

actually its quite warm in DC today

as far as moss, i agree that TO has been elite for awhile, and, while moss may not be on his level yet, he does have one small thing on TO. he had more yards recieving last year than TO has ever had in his career.

 

[5Stars]

Go ahead, write it off as nonsesne. You can pretend the biggest loss in the rivalries history didn't sting, but I guarantee it stung Big Tuna.

How old are you sickone?

Because if you think that is the biggest loss in the history of the rivalry, then, again, you are showing the RedStink logic...

And, I'm sure the Tuna has lost to worse teams then the Commanders!

Hey, talking about that first game, did you see Lil Danny jumping all up and down, up and down, with his binky in his hand? On National TV? His wife was just sitting there all embarassed!

Did you RedStink fans wet your pants, too?

:dissskin:

 

[Alexander]

No shivering going on after what happened last year.

How much mileage can you people get off of that?

The Cowboys owned the Commanders (literally) for years on end and yet Dallas fans were never entitled bragging rights. There was always a "but": crooked referees, bad luck, injuries, black cats. And it applied for you no matter what. Even when you lost to a 1-15 team.

You cling to your infrequent victories and overblow them.

When the losses pile up, they are dismissed.

It is sad. Completely and utterly pathetic.