To all of you throwing a temper tantrum about the Claiborne pick, let me try to provide a little big-picture perspective.
Think of a scenario in which someone approached you four years ago with the following proposition. Your favorite team can head down one of the following two paths:
- Over the next 4 years, the Cowboys will select 4 solid, first round picks that very few people will really be able to really complain about
- Over the next 4 years, the Cowboys will select 3 Pro Bowlers in the first round, but one of the 4 picks will flame out
Which scenario would you choose?
I'd posit that both scenarios are HIGHLY unlikely because the draft has an inherent "crap shoot" nature to it and few teams can get through a 4 year span without any disappointments. I'd also argue that very few teams can get through a 4-year span picking 3 Pro-Bowlers in the first round (although I haven't done the analysis to prove the point).
In the grand scheme of things, I'd say the Cowboys have done pretty well in the first round over the past 4 years with Garrett at the helm (heading down Scenario #2).
I also think that throwing a continued tantrum over one pick seems pretty futile, given the improvement this past year and the positive direction that this team seems to be heading.
As someone else pointed out, the Claiborne pick seemed to be an impulse pick, and they hadn't done their homework on the kid because they didn't expect him to slip (shame on them). But it seems to me that when this staff has the time to think and work methodically through their board, they do seem to make pretty sound decisions (at least lately).
And for that reason, I remain optimistic about the pick.