Sorry, but you left out his 3 elimination games I told you to include them because those are part of the reason Romo doesn't get the respect his play deserves. Those 3 season finale elimination games were like playoff games and can't be ignored. His playoff/elimination game TD to turnover ratio is 12-12. Although Rivers has a worse TD to turnover ratio he's won 2 more playoff games than Romo and reached a title game.
Man I'm sorry, but this made me laugh out loud. Are you including the elimination game that Kyle Orton, and not Tony Romo started? By all means, please clear that up for the class. It really doesn't look good claiming to be unbiased when you attribute Romo in an elimination game that he didn't even play in.
And are you including only games lost? Because when the Eagles were 9-3 last year, basically every game was considered an "elimination game". Along with the NFC Playoff hunt that was just crazy this year, and tiebreaker scenario in which we undoubted had to "win and in", those should by all means be considered "elimination games".
Is there anyone out there that didn't think if we lost one of those we'd probably not get in? That's all everyone was talking about. It was a given.
Romo's TD/int ratio during those 3 games before we clinched before our game Week 17?
10/0.
And a passer rating averaging about 135 or something ridiculous. That's all that really needs to be said. Frankly, it's hard to evaluate your QB's decision making prowess when your OL is getting him killed (in some cases not even getting out of their stance. See:
Colombo, Playoff game, Minnesota). Or his OL is just one of the hottest piles of garbage i've seen in recent memory and no one knew how to stop a max blitz (See:
OL Week 16, vs. Commanders 2012). Some of the blame for that Commanders game goes on Romo, but the entire offense deserves blame for that game, from the OL to Romo to the Coaches. They were horribly prepared. I'm pretty sure Phil Costa also started that game, oh how far we've come.
Romo played fine in the elimination game vs. the Giants in 2011. 2/1 and 289. He could have thrown for 350, we weren't winning that game.
I think that just about sums that up.
Back to the OP. For "perspective's sake" he's going to need a ring, at least from the general populace. You know, the guys that talk about football from their high school days, when they could eat without getting winded, and always talk about how it was a team game in a wise, knowing voice like it's some secret no one knows about. Then as soon as we lose they harp on Tony's one mistake, after our defense gives up 40 points and we lose by 2.
I know he's elite. If he's not "elite", at the very least he's on the cusp. Anyone that thinks differently doesn't really watch Cowboys games or know much about football in general, in my oh so humble opinion. It's not his fault his teams have sucked recently (last year excluded obviously)