I know it's not just his fault but Dak's record against winning teams the past 3 years is not good.
He's 5-13 the past 3 seasons.
He threw for a lot of garbage stats in many of the losses and hasn't performed at a top level.
For a 4th round pick, he was given a lot of deference.
But now, he's compensated as a Top level QB and he is expected to perform as such and find a way to overcome deficiencies outside of his control.
The Top QB's tend to "find a way" and that's what will be expected of Dak.
I hope he can deliver.
I think back in the 80s people had more common sense. I'm no Dak fan. I could take him or leave him. I would have been just fine had they moved on. In fact, Dallas would probably have Fields right now if it were up to me. But Dak doesn't have a record. The Cowboys suck against good teams.
I remember back in 1985 when the Cowboys lost to the Bengals 50-24 my friend said the Cowboys suck anytime they play a good team. He didn't say Danny White sucked, he said the Cowboys. And my friend wasn't the brightest bulb in the box. But he wasn't dumb enough to blame it solely on the quarterback of a 53 man team.
Like I said, I am absolutely not a Dak fan. But this crap about his record, who he can and cannot beat, this stuff has to stop because people are starting to look ********. It's hard to even argue the point because the person making these claims are so far in left field. Like trying to argue with a maniac. The Cowboys win and lose games, not Dak Prescott. Dak is not a golfer. Dak is not a MLB pitcher.
Yeah, QBs can lose you games with terrible play. I've seen it multiple times with Romo, a QB I loved. But as much as I don't like Dak, I can't point to any games where I could say yeah, Dak sucked so much he cost us the game. That Dak plays so bad against good teams that we can't win. No such thing.