If we don't win HFA, then we are going to have a really tough time getting through the playoffs - Dak doesn't look like somebody who could win on the road against any cold weather team in January at this point.
We need to win next week, period. If Dak isn't getting it done, give Tony a chance, it's not just about the loss yesterday.....the passing game has been the weak link for the past 3 weeks & Dak appears to be understandably shaken.
http://www.nbcdfw.com/blogs/blue-star/Watkins-Cowboys-Reaction_Dallas-Fort-Worth-405972006.html
oh my friggin lord. if the coaching staff lacked confidence in dak he would not be here much less starting and for damn sure romo would have been back as soon as he was able.
the crap people make up is just astounding at times.
Dak should remain the starter, but if he struggles vs the Bucs, then we need to make the move to Romo.
I cant believe most of you are ok with letting our beat season in 20 years go to waste by continuing to start a stuggling rookie QB
I don't necessarily agree with all of this.Not exactly the same situation, I think. Manning was signed as the starter. Last year, Manning started the season and was struggling to make the plays he was accustomed. Kubiak wanted more consistency from the offense, sat Manning and started Osweiler. Manning's benching was never meant as a permanent change. Osweiler did begin to struggle and Manning replaced him but it was also after Manning accepted his physical limitations and began managing the game better. In my opinion, Kubiak made the switch back because he believed Manning accepted the conditions of his new role.
In Dallas, Romo was the unquestioned starter. Injury benched him. Prescott ran away with the golden opportunity--so much so that some people (the front office in particular) tied the winning streak directly and almost exclusively to Prescott's presence in the offense. This association was summarized and accepted through the analogy, "You can't mess with the chemistry." The front office made the decision of making the quarterback change permanent. Romo understood and confirmed the move with The Statement. Dallas and Denver's situation are different in that Manning's was an intended temporary change until Manning got his act together and Romo's benching was a permanent change due to circumstance.
Does everybody forget Nick ******* Foles? RG3? ....
Who is to say Dak isn't a flash in the pan benefiting from a strong O line, run game, and weak opposition to make him look better than what he really is.
i think the real pattern is people are quick to panic.2 might be the start of a pattern. Like I said let's see how he responds vs Tampa Bay before making any changes.
If you are going to go make a switch, that would likely be too late - we'd have squandered HFA.I only play Romo if they lose to the bucks and lions. Then play Romo against the eagles as a warm up game.
well that should get him on the field.Wow the voting is close. Another bad week and I think it swings ten percent for Romo.
In my opinion, there are very few people in the world who appreciate being demoted for any reason.I don't necessarily agree with all of this.
It was widely reported that Brock was highly pissed at John Elway for replacing him as the starter, so pissed that Brock would not even go with the Broncos to the White House to celebrate their SB win.
Obviously Brock didn't see Manning's benching and him being named the starter as a temporary situation as you are saying, at least Brock apparently feels that it wasn't a temporary change. Otherwise, if it was just a temp move and all parties knew it was a temp move, why did Brock get so pissed about it? He obviously didn't feel it was a temp move at all and Elway back stabbed him by going back to Manning.