Wow...YOU'RE the one who made this thread saying in such a matter of fact way:
Roy <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Ed Reed.
That's a lot of less than signs.
First of all, fix your "s" key.
So you're just going to the last game. Talk about a very selective memory.
And you're saying that I'M always right? If I were, I'd be GM. I'm not always right, but I'm right on this. Why does everything have to be in extremes with some of you posters. "Player X is the greatest! Player Y sucks!"
Yeah, Roy might not be better than Reed, and I don't think he is, but the posts coming from some of you that Roy can't do ANYTHING is just ludicrous.
"yet reed had 2, should've been 3."

. This is hilarious. When Roy dropped an INT, you all jumped all over him saying he has no hands. And when Reed doesn't get one, you say "oh darn, let's count it anyway!"
And this is complete "pot calling the kettle black". The Roy haters will go on to dismiss everything he does well, while exaggerating everything he does badly. Why can't YOU ever admit that you're wrong?