And you cherry-picked the numbers you wanted while leaving out the others, tackles, tackles for loss, and sacks. Talk about apples to oranges! Did you think nobody would notice?
Yeah, and neither do you, that's why it's a projection. But Dallas is the only team I care about, so feel free to tell me where he's going to play? And "accordingly" to who? You?
Yeah, you keep telling yourself that. A couple of plays qualifies for you. Thank goodness for low standards...
Sure you did. And again, you cherry-picked your numbers, leaving out the ones that clearly showed that your guy wasn't the playmaker you're trying to make him out to be.
Being a play maker would obviously mean, interceptions, forced fumbles and fumble recoveries according to your own words.
Jack was in coverage most of the time therefore the other categories will not be of comparative value unless they too were in coverage as well most of the time.
And again, I'll reiterate since you want to try to skip over it. Which of those other players were drafted at #4 overall, and which were then projected to be moved to another position?
Oh, and which of them were coming off of a significant knee injury too?
Sorry but you cherry picked NFL numbers and are obviously emmbarrassed yet again for not comparing their actual college production in terms of play making ability, funny you failed to list these numbers.
Did you think no one would notice the other players college production?
Since Jack was mostly put in coverage the other statistics would be of little value, however, based on interceptions, fumble recoveries and forced fumbles he has the same production with one less year of college and while being moved around and playing offense.
You argued yourself that even while playing in coverage the numbers should be there and when compared to the others, playing one position, they are similar.
Again, the guy that fails to watch the game tape, declaring Jack had never played the mike because according to you, he never did so, so embarrassing.
You were wrong about Jack playing the mike, your production argument was reduced to absurdity and now all you have is projection.
Jack played all three positions throughout his career, get busy on the 29 games of tape because apparently sticking your head in the sand, refusing to watch tape allows you to think it was just a few plays...that is humiliating.
How do you get Jack is a projection as a linebacker? I only argued he can play the Mike, not that he must play the Mike on the next level.
There is absolutely zero projection as Jack being a linebacker, why is this hard for you to understand, no one is arguing that he must play the Mike, that is your overstatement, not mine.
Further, who says Jack must be picked at #4, this is another of your false creations, I simply stated that in this particular draft Jack is a top 5 talent and is worthy of consideration in the top five accordingly.
Why do you think all of the top evaluators and scouts have him rated that high in this draft?
Probably because unlike you, they actually looked at all of his game tape!
Jack has went through medicals at the combine with no issues and will be medically cleared for his pro day in two weeks, he has been lifting, running and training for some time, the knee is no longer an issue.
