Flamma
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 24,298
- Reaction score
- 20,849
This thread....lol.
Can we move on to the moon landing?
I'd love to. Are you going to tell me you don't believe we landed on this object?
This thread....lol.
Can we move on to the moon landing?
Garrison was a crook and an embarrassment. Once again JFK was FICTION.JUST A COINCIDENCE that David Ferrie comes Jim Garrison's chief suspect in the JFK assassination and the news breaks on Feb 17,1967 from New Orleans newspapers and on Feb 22,1967 David Ferrie happens to die of natural causes of course.
NO CONSPIRACY, RIGHT BLIND ZEBRA?
Has anyone noticed that you are attacking me more than looking at what I am posting because too many coincidences of these people who know each other which you can't argue away? Nice use of emoticons again, that should make people believe you with funny emoticons. Schills need a new handbook.Has anyone else noticed that Timb2's list of proof includes everybody that was alive in November 1963 not named Lee Harvey Oswald? Maybe it was suicide?
Half your posts you make have my name in it, and I am attacking you? LOLHas anyone noticed that you are attacking me more than looking at what I am posting because too many coincidences of these people who know each other which you can't argue away? Nice use of emoticons again, that should make people believe you with funny emoticons. Schills need a new handbook.
I'd love to. Are you going to tell me you don't believe we landed on this object?
^^^^^^, lmao, and so true. Society, in general, will never know who/whom exactly did it. An objectionable conclusion would be as to who/whom profited from JFK'S absence.Hell, I could probably do a 6 degrees of separation and get that Bigfoot and the Lock Nest Monster must have been in on it.
^^^^^^, lmao, and so true. Society, in general, will never know who/whom exactly did it. An objectionable conclusion would be as to who/whom profited from JFK'S absence.
Yeah witnesses like Aquilla Clemmons don't back the Warren Commission BS story. Yeah she is not swayed on what she saw.Half your posts you make have my name in it, and I am attacking you? LOL
The difference between you and me is I look at each thing, analyse it, research its validity, and hold it to a standard of believability. You see something you believe it regardless of how ridiculous it may be or the fact it contradicts other ridiculous theories. It is like I said, you think EVERYONE was involved. I am still waiting for you to supply some proof and not some connect the dots so and so knew what's his name, who knew that one guy, who was in cahoots with that guy who did that thing. Hell, I could probably do a 6 degrees of separation and get that Bigfoot and the Lock Nest Monster must have been in on it.
Too bad for you that the vast majority of witnesses herd three shots, and thought they came from the Book Depository. They found Oswald's gun, his finger prints were on it, he left the scene, killed Tippitt, again with witnesses. The bullet recovered matched his gun, the fragments in the bodies and car matched his gun. The medical evidence, including the original testimony of the Parkland doctors, shows two shots from behind hit Kennedy. The fact that the wound in Connally's armpit was a keyhole without bullet wipe proves he was hit by a bullet that contacted something first. Three shots, miss, hit JFK and Connally, hit Kennedy and there is ample evidence to support it.