Hoofbite
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 40,871
- Reaction score
- 11,570
Chocolate Lab;3277946 said:No kidding.
Even then, why are people getting so worked up?
Chocolate Lab;3277946 said:No kidding.
Hoofbite;3277958 said:Even then, why are people getting so worked up?
Hostile;3277951 said:How can anything be clear to you given where your head is?
Is it clear to you that the 20 points Dallas held them to was only eclipsed by the 14 points the Jets held them to and eliminated them from the playoffs?
My apologies. I asked a football question. That was wrong of me to go over your head on a topic. My bad.
Phillip Rivers and Tony Romo don't play on the Defenses.Monster Heel;3277961 said:The Chargers soundly whipped the Cowboys in third down efficiency and Phillip Rivers had a higher yards per attempt than Tony Romo.
The Jets forced Rivers to turn it over twice and the Chargers were horrible on third down (the Jets were too though). The Chargers leaving points on the field was the clinching factor.
What's it to you?Hoofbite;3277958 said:Even then, why are people getting so worked up?
Monster Heel;3277961 said:The Chargers soundly whipped the Cowboys in third down efficiency and Phillip Rivers had a higher yards per attempt than Tony Romo.
The Jets forced Rivers to turn it over twice and the Chargers were horrible on third down (the Jets were too though). The Chargers leaving points on the field was the clinching factor.
Hostile;3277965 said:Phillip Rivers and Tony Romo don't play on the Defenses.
I knew this was over your head.
Hostile;3277966 said:What's it to you?
zrinkill;3277967 said:So let me get this straight ..... the Cowboys beating the Saints in the regular season means nothing.
But because the Chargers beat us in the regular season we are not a good defense.
You are incredible with your thought process.
.
.
.
.
..
Monster Heel;3277970 said:Your reasoning skills are pretty poor if that's what you've inferred from all of this, but okay whatever.
zrinkill;3277977 said:That is exactly what you have said so far in this thread.
You said the Saints game means nothing because that was the regular season ....
And you use the Chargers game to point out how our defense isn't really that good.
You are talking out both sides of your *** (as usual) and everyone here can see it but you.
.
.
.
.
Monster Heel;3277968 said:
I wasn't aware that the Cowboys defense wasn't responsible for Phillip Rivers out passing Tony Romo and being unable to stop the Chargers on third down.
I reach fed up with people who know nothing at lightning speed on Mondays.Chief;3277969 said:Hos had gunpowder in his cornflakes this morning.
STSINAZ;3277826 said:we have one and you will see ALOT of him next year...his name is kevin ogletree....he's the next terry glenn for us...very smooth in getting in and out of his routes and he has some SPEED! just get us on O line that is not stupid and we are there jerrah..
Monster Heel;3277982 said:The Chargers game is a clear example of why having the #2 scoring defense is overrated and why simply limiting a team from scoring isn't not a be all and end all indicator of a good defensive performance. There are other examples of this for Dallas in 2009, but that one stands out and I'm using it as a talking point.
Monster Heel;3277982 said:Clearly, you don't understand the discourse in this topic, so move along.
Really.Hoofbite;3277938 said:All this over a difference of opinion?
Hostile;3277966 said:What's it to you?
zrinkill;3277987 said:Yet no one is allowed to use the Saints game as an example of why they are a good defense.
Hence talking out both sides of your *** .....
The Saints weren't playing for an undefeated season? Ware off a neck injury qualifies as abnormally healthy? You are really talking nonsense now. Nevermind my previous commentary. Beatdown back on.Monster Heel;3277993 said:Yeah, a Saints team playing for nothing with countless guys injured vs an abnormally healthy Cowboys team playing for everything.
Monster Heel;3277993 said:Yeah, a Saints team playing for nothing with countless guys injured