StarBoyz83
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,435
- Reaction score
- 11,978
If it went down somewhat like this if I was dallas I'd grab Michael Thomas in the 2nd and not even think about it!!
Agreed
There are also plenty of examples of QBs who were not as highly touted as Luck or Elway coming out of college but had great careers. And who is to say if Luck will win a single SB?
Waiting until the next Luck or Elway comes is just a straw man argument
Paxton Lynch needs to "Wow" at the Combine next week as well as his pro day and individual workouts. His lackluster Bowl performance is lingering and he's become a forgotten man.
That's not my point. Osweiler has been in the league since 2012.
I am talking about anyone thinking that we need Goff or Wentz because they'll step in as rookies and solve our backup QB situation next year.
I have no issue with that point.
However, I prefer Dallas to draft a good QB but not reach for one that's not warranted of the fourth pick.
But they are reaches. And you know it.
They were the worst run team until the last 2-3 years.
The term "reach" should only be used on a team by team basis. A teams draftboard and a draftboard found online through some media source is going to be wildly different. Travis Frederick was a reach for many pundits but he wasn't on the Cowboys board.
If the Cowboys do their grades and decide Paxton Lynch is the 3rd best player in the draft...take him at 4 if he is the BPA. Who cares what any media pundit says? I guarantee you team scouts are not checking out Mel Kiper or Walterfootball to see what they should base their picks off of.
I don't want the Cowboys to "reach" either. I want them to stick to their board.
Buckner at 3 pushing Bosa to 6? Kiper's losing it.
No, including these last 3 years. Last year's offseason was an abortion.
Using this theory no team ever really reaches. They all think the player is worth the pick or they wouldn't have drafted him.
It's an opinion. A projection based on that opinion. I have no problem with it whether it's positive or negative.
I have no issue with that point.
However, I prefer Dallas to draft a good QB but not reach for one that's not warranted of the fourth pick.
Hardy was. Not sure yet on the rest. Jones shows promise.
No, including these last 3 years. Last year's offseason was an abortion.
Well some teams do feel pressure to reach for certain positions. I believe we reached for position when we selected Quincy Carter. I am okay with us taking a QB at 4...I just don't want us to take a QB at 4 just cause he's a QB, I want us to take him because he is the BPA or close to it.
What exactly was so awful about it? The players we let go are not doing so hot.
We could get Durant and Carter back this offseason if we felt the need to since the teams that signed them feel they were not worth the contract. Henry Melton? I don't know how he's been but he wasn't a huge impact player last season. Demarco Murray? Yeah it stinks we lost him but we made the right decision not matching the Eagles contract especially since we still ran the ball okay while Murray was awful. Anthony Spencer? No. George Selvie? No.
Dwayne Harris? He got a lot of hype this year but he is still not a good receiver. His best season ever was his sophmore year with us. He started games this year but he was outperformed by Cole Beasely overall. He was a good returner for NYG but he wasn't an impact player for us in that regard last season. Lucky Whitehead was better this year as a returner once he got going than Harris was last year.
At the end of the day, Sterling Moore probably had the best season (besides Harris as a returner) than any player we let go. That says a lot. Biggest mistake last offseason was not doing more to replace Weeden but still, I don't know how many options were out there that would've been a significant upgrade and accepted a backup spot.
Definitely was. Bad FA, bad draft. The monumental mistake of going into the season with the backups QBs they had alone makes it a terrible offseason.
This literally has to be at least the 100th time I've read the don't take any QB just to take one comment. Why doesn't this work at other positions? Why don't I ever read just don't take a cornerback just to take one? It's like we're trying to come to grips with taking a guy we can't see on the field immediately.
You're at 4. Stack your board. If there's a franchise QB there that's your guy because his potential value trumps all others. To not take him is reaching.
You're seriously asking me what was so bad about an offseason that led to picking 4th in this draft?
You're seriously asking me what was so bad about an offseason that led to picking 4th in this draft?